Refobacin Bone Cement R and Palacos Overall, 75 patients were included in the study and 71 were available at two years postoperatively. Prior to surgery, they were randomized to one of the three combinations studied: Palacos cement with use of the Optivac mixing system, Refobacin with use of the Optivac system, and Refobacin with use of the Optipac system. Cemented MS30 stems and cemented Exceed acetabular components were used in all hips. Postoperative radiographs were used to assess the quality of the cement mantle according to Barrack et al, and the position and migration of the femoral stem. Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, Forgotten Joint Score, and University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale were collected.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term patient-reported outcome, bone remodelling, and migration of a short stem (Collum Femoris Preserving; CFP) with a conventional uncemented stem (Corail). Of 81 patients who were initially enrolled, 71 were available at five years’ follow-up. The outcomes at two years have previously been reported. The primary outcome measure was the clinical result assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Secondary outcomes were the migration of the stem, measured using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), change of bone mineral density (BMD) around the stem, the development of radiolucent lines, and additional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Aims
Methods
We investigated patient characteristics and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral component revision and/or osteosynthesis. The study utilized data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) and information from patient records. We included all primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in Sweden since 1979, and undergoing further surgery due to Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fracture between 2001 and 2011. The primary outcome measure was any further reoperation between 2001 and 2013. Cross-referencing with the National Patient Register was performed in two stages, in order to identify all surgical procedures not recorded on the SHAR.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of aseptic
loosening after the use of a cemented acetabular component and a
Trabecular Metal (TM) acetabular component (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw,
Indiana) at acetabular revision with bone impaction grafting. A total of 42 patients were included in the study. Patients were
randomised to receive an all- polyethylene cemented acetabular component
(n = 19) or a TM component (n = 23). Radiostereometric analysis
and conventional radiographic examinations were performed regularly
up to two years post-operatively or until further revision.Aims
Patients and Methods
Compared with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), revision
surgery can be challenging. The cement-in-cement femoral revision
technique involves removing a femoral component from a well-fixed
femoral cement mantle and cementing a new stem into the original
mantle. This technique is widely used and when carried out for the
correct indications, is fast, relatively inexpensive and carries
a reduced short-term risk for the patient compared with the alternative
of removing well-fixed cement. We report the outcomes of this procedure
when two commonly used femoral stems are used. We identified 1179 cement-in-cement stem revisions involving
an Exeter or a Lubinus stem reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty
Register (SHAR) between January 1999 and December 2015. Kaplan-Meier
survival analysis was performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
It has been suggested that cemented fixation of total hip arthroplasty
(THA) is associated with an increased peri-operative mortality compared
with cementless THA. Our aim was to investigate this through a nationwide
matched cohort study adjusting for age, comorbidity, and socioeconomic
background. A total of 178 784 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent
either cemented or cementless THA from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty
Register were matched with 862 294 controls from the general population.
Information about the causes of death, comorbidities, and socioeconomic
background was obtained. Mortality within the first 90 days after
the operation was the primary outcome measure.Aims
Patients and Methods
The effects of surgical approach in total hip
replacement on health-related quality of life and long-term pain
and satisfaction are unknown. From the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty
Register, we extracted data on all patients that had received a
total hip replacement for osteoarthritis through either the posterior
or the direct lateral approach, with complete pre- and one-year
post-operative Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). A total
of 42 233 patients met the inclusion criteria and of these 4962
also had complete six-year PROM data. The posterior approach resulted in
an increased mean satisfaction score of 15 ( Cite this article:
While an increasing amount of arthroplasty articles
report comorbidity measures, none have been validated for outcomes.
In this study, we compared commonly used International Classification
of Diseases-based comorbidity measures with re-operation rates after
total hip replacement (THR). Scores used included the Charlson,
the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson, and the Elixhauser comorbidity
score. We identified a nationwide cohort of 134 423 THRs from the
Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Re-operations were registered
post-operatively for up to 12 years. The hazard ratio was estimated
by Cox’s proportional hazards regression, and we used C-statistics
to assess each measure’s ability to predict re-operation. Confounding
variables were age, gender, type of implant fixation, hospital category,
hospital implant volume and year of surgery. In the first two years only the Elixhauser score showed any significant
relationship with increased risk of re-operation, with increased
scores for both one to two and three or more comorbidities. However,
the predictive C-statistic in this period for the Elixhauser score
was poor (0.52). None of the measures proved to be of any value between
two and 12 years. They might be of value in large cohort or registry
studies, but not for the individual patient. Cite this article:
We present the development and results of a nationwide, prospective, observational follow-up programme including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. The programme started in 2002 and has gradually expanded to include all units performing total hip replacement in Sweden. The self-administered PROMs protocol comprises the EQ-5D instrument, the Charnley class categorisation and visual analogue scales for pain and satisfaction. These current analyses include 34 960 total hip replacements with complete pre- and one-year post-operative questionnaires. Patients eligible for total hip replacement generally report low health-related quality of life and suffer from pain. One year post-operatively the mean EQ-5D index increased to above the level of an age- and gender-matched population, with a considerable reduction of pain (p <
0.001). Females, younger patients and those with Charnley category C reported a lower EQ-5D index pre-operatively than males, older patients and Charnley category A or B, respectively (all p <
0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis Charnley category C, male gender and higher age were associated with less improvement in health-related quality of life (p <
0.001). Nationwide implementation of a PROMs programme requires a structured organisation and effective data capture. Patients’ response rates to the Registry are good. The continuous collection of PROMs permits local and national improvement work and allows for further health-economic evaluation.
Between 1999 and 2005, 10 264 patients who had undergone total hip replacement (THR) for subcapital fracture of the hip were compared with 76 520 in whom THR had been performed for other reasons. All the cases were identified through the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. The THRs performed as primary treatment for fracture were also compared with those done after failure of internal fixation. After seven years the rate of revision was higher in THR after fracture (4.4% vs 2.9%). Dislocation and periprosthetic fracture were the most common causes of revision. The risk was higher in men than in women. The type of femoral component and the surgical approach influenced the risk. After correction for gender, type of component and the surgical approach the revision rates were similar in the primary and secondary fracture THR groups. Total hip replacement is therefore a safe method for both the primary and secondary management of fracture of the hip.
We enrolled 98 patients (107 hips) with a mean age of 47 years (SD 8.6) into a prospective study of the Madreporic Lord THR; 34 hips had primary and 73 secondary osteoarthritis. After ten years, the survival rate using revision as the endpoint for failure was 70% (±9) for the cup and 98% (±0.3) for the stem. The combined clinical and radiological survival rates were 46% (±11) and 81% (±10), respectively. Osteoporosis due to stress-shielding was observed in the proximal femur. Hips with radiologically dense bone postoperatively showed the most pronounced bone loss. We recommend continued radiological follow-up of patients with this type of implant to allow revision to be performed before there is severe bony destruction of the pelvis.
