The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to describe trends in length of stay and early complications and readmissions following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed at eight different centres in Denmark using a fast-track protocol and to compare the length of stay between centres with high and low utilization of UKA. We included data from eight dedicated fast-track centres, all reporting UKAs to the same database, between 2010 and 2018. Complete ( > 99%) data on length of stay, 90-day readmission, and mortality were obtained during the study period. Specific reasons for a length of stay of > two days, length of stay > four days, and 30- and 90-day readmission were recorded. The use of UKA in the different centres was dichotomized into ≥ 20% versus < 20% of arthroplasties which were undertaken being UKAs, and ≥ 52 UKAs versus < 52 UKAs being undertaken annually.Aims
Methods
We present detailed information about early morbidity
after aseptic revision knee replacement from a nationwide study.
All aseptic revision knee replacements undertaken between 1st October
2009 and 30th September 2011 were analysed using the Danish National
Patient Registry with additional information from the Danish Knee
Arthroplasty Registry. The 1218 revisions involving 1165 patients
were subdivided into total revisions, large partial revisions, partial
revisions and revisions of unicondylar replacements (UKR revisions).
The mean age was 65.0 years (27 to 94) and the median length of
hospital stay was four days (interquartile range: 3 to 5), with
a 90 days re-admission rate of 9.9%,
re-operation rate of 3.5% and mortality rate of 0.2%. The age ranges
of 51 to 55 years (p = 0.018), 76 to 80 years (p <
0.001) and ≥ 81
years (p <
0.001) were related to an increased risk of re-admission.
The age ranges of 76 to 80 years (p = 0.018) and the large partial
revision subgroup (p = 0.073) were related to an increased risk
of re-operation. The ages from 76 to 80 years (p <
0.001), age ≥ 81
years (p <
0.001) and surgical time >
120 min (p <
0.001)
were related to increased length of hospital stay, whereas the use
of a tourniquet (p = 0.008) and surgery in a low volume centre (p
= 0.013) were related to shorter length of stay. In conclusion, we found a similar incidence of early post-operative
morbidity after aseptic knee revisions as has been reported after
primary procedures. This suggests that a length of hospital stay ≤ four
days and discharge home at that time is safe following aseptic knee
revision surgery in Denmark. Cite this article:
