The prevalence of ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rising in concert with life expectancy, putting more patients at risk for interprosthetic femur fractures (IPFFs). Our study aimed to assess treatment methodologies, implant survivorship, and IPFF clinical outcomes. A total of 76 patients treated for an IPFF from February 1985 to April 2018 were reviewed. Prior to fracture, at the hip/knee sites respectively, 46 femora had primary/primary, 21 had revision/primary, three had primary/revision, and six had revision/revision components. Mean age and BMI were 74 years (33 to 99) and 30 kg/m2 (21 to 46), respectively. Mean follow-up after fracture treatment was seven years (2 to 24).Aims
Methods
The extensive variation in axial rotation of tibial components can lead to coronal plane malalignment. We analyzed the change in coronal alignment induced by tray malrotation. We constructed a computer model of knee arthroplasty and used a virtual cutting guide to cut the tibia at 90° to the coronal plane. The virtual guide was rotated axially (15° medial to 15° lateral) and with posterior slopes (0° to 7°). To assess the effect of axial malrotation, we measured the coronal plane alignment of a tibial tray that was axially rotated (25° internal to 15° external), as viewed on a standard anteroposterior (AP) radiograph.Aims
Methods
Minimally invasive total knee replacement (MIS-TKR)
has been reported to have better early recovery than conventional
TKR. Quadriceps-sparing (QS) TKR is the least invasive MIS procedure,
but it is technically demanding with higher reported rates of complications
and outliers. This study was designed to compare the early clinical
and radiological outcomes of TKR performed by an experienced surgeon
using the QS approach with or without navigational assistance (NA),
or using a mini-medial parapatellar (MP) approach. In all, 100 patients
completed a minimum two-year follow-up: 30 in the NA-QS group, 35
in the QS group, and 35 in the MP group. There were no significant
differences in clinical outcome in terms of ability to perform a
straight-leg raise at 24 hours (p = 0.700), knee score (p = 0.952),
functional score (p = 0.229) and range of movement (p = 0.732) among
the groups. The number of outliers for all three radiological parameters
of mechanical axis, frontal femoral component alignment and frontal
tibial component alignment was significantly lower in the NA-QS
group than in the QS group (p = 0.008), but no outlier was found
in the MP group. In conclusion, even after the surgeon completed a substantial
number of cases before the commencement of this study, the supplementary
intra-operative use of computer-assisted navigation with QS-TKR
still gave inferior radiological results and longer operating time,
with a similar outcome at two years when compared with a MP approach. Cite this article:
