We evaluated the clinical results and complications
after extra-articular resection of the distal femur and/or proximal
tibia and reconstruction with a tumour endoprosthesis (MUTARS) in
59 patients (mean age 33 years (11 to 74)) with malignant bone or
soft-tissue tumours. According to a Kaplan–Meier analysis, limb
survival was 76% (95% confidence interval (CI) 64.1 to 88.5) after
a mean follow-up of 4.7 years (one month to 17 years). Peri-prosthetic infection
was the most common indication for subsequent amputation (eight
patients). Survival of the prosthesis without revision was 48% (95%
CI 34.8 to 62.0) at two years and 25% (95% CI 11.1 to 39.9) at five years
post-operatively. Failure of the prosthesis was due to deep infection
in 22 patients (37%), aseptic loosening in ten patients (17%), and
peri-prosthetic fracture in six patients (10%). Wear of the bearings
made a minor revision necessary in 12 patients (20%). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumor Society score was 23 (10 to 29). An extensor lag >
10° was
noted in ten patients (17%). These results suggest that limb salvage after extra-articular
resection with a tumour prosthesis can achieve good functional results
in most patients, although the rates of complications and subsequent
amputation are higher than in patients treated with intra-articular
resection. Cite this article:
To date, all surgical techniques used for reconstruction
of the pelvic ring following supra-acetabular tumour resection produce
high complication rates. We evaluated the clinical, oncological
and functional outcomes of a cohort of 35 patients (15 men and 20
women), including 21 Ewing’s sarcomas, six chondrosarcomas, three sarcomas
not otherwise specified, one osteosarcoma, two osseous malignant
fibrous histiocytomas, one synovial cell sarcoma and one metastasis.
The mean age of the patients was 31 years (8 to 79) and the latest
follow-up was carried out at a mean of 46 months (1.9 to 139.5)
post-operatively. We undertook a functional reconstruction of the pelvic ring using
polyaxial screws and titanium rods. In 31 patients (89%) the construct
was encased in antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate. Preservation
of the extremities was possible for all patients. The survival rate
at three years was 93.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77.9 to 98.4),
at five years it was 82.4% (95% CI 57.6 to 93.4). For the 21 patients
with Ewing’s sarcoma it was 95.2% (95% CI 70.7 to 99.3) and 81.5%
(95% CI 52.0 to 93.8), respectively. Wound healing problems were
observed in eight patients, deep infection in five and clinically
asymptomatic breakage of the screws in six. The five-year implant survival
was 93.3% (95% CI 57.8 to 95.7). Patients were mobilised at a mean
of 3.5 weeks (1 to 7) post-operatively. A post-operative neurological
defect occurred in 12 patients. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society
score at last available follow-up was 21.2 (10 to 27). This reconstruction technique is characterised by simple and
oncologically appropriate applicability, achieving high primary
stability that allows early mobilisation, good functional results
and relatively low complication rates. Cite this article:
In 45 patients we assessed the functional results and complications for three different reconstructive procedures after resection of primary tumors of the proximal humerus. An osteoarticular allograft was used in 11, a The complication rate was lowest after reconstruction with a tumour prosthesis. The At follow-up at two years the functional results for the three reconstructive procedures were the same with a mean functional rating of 79% (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society). Excision of the glenoid had no influence on the functional result. Our findings indicate that the use of a tumour prosthesis is the most reliable limb-salvage procedure for the proximal humerus. The
