The relationship between post-operative bone
density and subsequent failure of total knee replacement (TKR) is
not known. This retrospective study aimed to determine the relationship
between bone density and failure, both overall and according to
failure mechanism. All 54 aseptic failures occurring in 50 patients
from 7760 consecutive primary cemented TKRs between 1983 and 2004
were matched with non-failing TKRs, and 47 failures in 44 patients
involved tibial failures with the matching characteristics of age
(65.1 for failed and 69.8 for non-failed), gender (70.2% female), diagnosis
(93.6% OA), date of operation, bilaterality, pre-operative alignment
(0.4 and 0.3 respectively), and body mass index (30.2 and 30.0 respectively).
In each case, the density of bone beneath the tibial component was assessed
at each follow-up interval using standardised, calibrated radiographs.
Failing knees were compared with controls both overall and, as a
subgroup analysis, by failure mechanism. Knees were compared with
controls using univariable linear regression. Significant and continuous elevation in tibial density was found
in knees that eventually failed by medial collapse (p <
0.001)
and progressive radiolucency (p <
0.001) compared with controls,
particularly in the medial region of the tibia. Knees failing due
to ligamentous instability demonstrated an initial decline in density
(p = 0.0152) followed by a non-decreasing density over time (p =
0.034 for equivalence). Non-failing knees reported a decline in
density similar to that reported previously using dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry (DEXA). Differences between failing and non-failing
knees were observable as early as two months following surgery.
This tool may be used to identify patients at risk of failure following
TKR, but more validation work is needed. Cite this article:
The strain on clinic and surgeon resources resulting
from a rise in demand for total knee replacement (TKR) requires reconsideration
of when and how often patients need to be seen for follow-up. Surgeons
will otherwise require increased paramedical staff or need to limit
the number of TKRs they undertake. We reviewed the outcome data
of 16 414 primary TKRs undertaken at our centre to determine the
time to re-operation for any reason and for specific failure mechanisms.
Peak risk years for failure were determined by comparing the conditional
probability of failure, the number of failures divided by the total
number of TKRs cases, for each year. The median times to failure
for the most common failure mechanisms were 4.9 years (interquartile
range (IQR) 1.7 to 10.7) for femoral and tibial loosening, 1.9 years
(IQR 0.8 to 3.9) for infection, 3.1 years (IQR 1.6 to 5.5) for tibial
collapse and 5.6 years (IQR 3.4 to 9.3) for instability. The median
time to failure for all revisions was 3.3 years (IQR 1.2 to 8.5),
with an overall revision rate of 1.7% (n = 282). Results from our
patient population suggest that patients be seen for follow-up at
six months, one year, three years, eight years, 12 years, and every
five years thereafter. Patients with higher pain in the early post-operative
period or high body mass index (≥ 41 kg/m2) should be
monitored more closely. Cite this article:
Stress shielding resulting in diminished bone
density following total knee replacement (TKR) may increase the
risk of migration and loosening of the prosthesis. This retrospective
study was designed to quantify the effects of the method of fixation
on peri-prosthetic tibial bone density beneath cemented and uncemented
tibial components of similar design and with similar long-term survival
rates. Standard radiographs taken between two months and 15 years
post-operatively were digitised from a matched group of TKRs using
cemented (n = 67) and uncemented (n = 67) AGC tibial prostheses.
Digital radiograph densitometry was used to quantify changes in
bone density over time. Age, length of follow-up, gender, body mass
index and alignment each significantly influenced the long-term
pattern of peri-prosthetic bone density. Similar long-term changes
in density irrespective of the method of fixation correlated well
with the high rate of survival of this TKR at 20 years, and suggest
that cemented and uncemented fixation are both equally viable. Cite this article:
Interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis has increased in recent years with apparent improvement in the long-term results. This is a result of improved surgical technique, patient selection, and implant design. In an effort further to improve patient selection we analysed the relationship between the pre-operative alignment of the knee and the anatomical findings at the time of surgery. We compared these findings with the indications for UKA. From 4021 total knee arthroplasties we compared intra-operative observations with the pre-operative clinical data in order to identify knees with isolated, medial, compartment changes, which would have been ideal candidates for UKA. We found that only 247 of the knees (6.1%) met anatomical qualifications for isolated, medial, unicompartmental osteoarthritis, and of these, only 168 (4.3%) met clinical standards ideal for UKA. Pre-operative alignment showed a significant relationship with patterns of disease. Logistic regression revealed a relationship between pre-operative alignment and intra-operative findings resembling a Gaussian distribution. Patients with a pre-operative varus alignment of 7° were slightly more likely to be selected for UKA. But the further the anatomical alignment in either direction varies from 7° of varus, the more unlikely it is for the knee to exhibit a disease pattern of isolated, medial, unicompartmental osteoarthritis.