The most widely used classification system for
acetabular fractures was developed by Judet, Judet and Letournel over
50 years ago primarily to aid surgical planning. As population demographics
and injury mechanisms have altered over time, the fracture patterns
also appear to be changing. We conducted a retrospective review
of the imaging of 100 patients with a mean age of 54.9 years (19
to 94) and a male to female ratio of 69:31 seen between 2010 and
2013 with acetabular fractures in order to determine whether the
current spectrum of injury patterns can be reliably classified using
the original system. Three consultant pelvic and acetabular surgeons and one senior
fellow analysed anonymous imaging. Inter-observer agreement for
the classification of fractures that fitted into defined categories
was substantial, (κ = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to
0.76) with improvement to near perfect on inclusion of CT imaging
(κ = 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.91). However, a high proportion of injuries
(46%) were felt to be unclassifiable by more than one surgeon; there
was moderate agreement on which these were (κ = 0.42 95% CI 0.31
to 0.54). Further review of the unclassifiable fractures in this cohort
of 100 patients showed that they tended to occur in an older population
(mean age 59.1 years; 22 to 94 Cite this article:
The increasing prevalence of osteoporosis in
an ageing population has contributed to older patients becoming
the fastest-growing group presenting with acetabular fractures.
We performed a systematic review of the literature involving a number
of databases to identify studies that included the treatment outcome
of acetabular fractures in patients aged >
55 years. An initial
search identified 61 studies; after exclusion by two independent
reviewers, 15 studies were considered to meet the inclusion criteria.
All were case series. The mean Coleman score for methodological
quality assessment was 37 (25 to 49). There were 415 fractures in
414 patients. Pooled analysis revealed a mean age of 71.8 years
(55 to 96) and a mean follow-up of 47.3 months (1 to 210). In seven
studies the results of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)
were presented: this was combined with simultaneous hip replacement
(THR) in four, and one study had a mixture of these strategies.
The results of percutaneous fixation were presented in two studies,
and a single study revealed the results of non-operative treatment. With fixation of the fracture, the overall mean rate of conversion
to THR was 23.1% (0% to 45.5%). The mean rate of non-fatal complications
was 39.8% (0% to 64%), and the mean mortality rate was 19.1% (5%
to 50%) at a mean of 64 months (95% confidence interval 59.4 to
68.6; range 12 to 143). Further data dealing with the classification
of the fracture, the surgical approach used, operative time, blood
loss, functional and radiological outcomes were also analysed. This study highlights that, of the many forms of treatment available
for this group of patients, there is a trend to higher complication
rates and the need for further surgery compared with the results
of the treatment of acetabular fractures in younger patients. Cite this article:
