Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for medial-compartment
osteoarthritis of the knee can be complicated by intra-operative
lateral hinge fracture (LHF). We aimed to establish the relationship
between hinge position and fracture types, and suggest an appropriate
hinge position to reduce the risk of this complication. Consecutive patients undergoing OWHTO were evaluated on coronal
multiplanar reconstruction CT images. Hinge positions were divided
into five zones in our new classification, by their relationship
to the proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ). Fractures were classified
into types I, II, and III according to the Takeuchi classification.Aims
Patients and Methods
We aimed to investigate factors related to the technique of medial
opening wedge high tibial osteotomy which might predispose to the
development of a lateral hinge fracture. A total of 71 patients with 82 osteotomies were included in the
study. Their mean age was 62.9 years (37 to 80). The classification
of the type of osteotomy was based on whether it extended beyond
the fibular head. The level of the osteotomy was classified according
to the height of its endpoint.Aims
Patients and Methods
The objective of this study was to validate the
efficacy of Takeuchi classification for lateral hinge fractures
(LHFs) in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). In all 74 osteoarthritic
knees (58 females, 16 males; mean age 62.9 years, standard deviation
7.5, 42 to 77) were treated with OWHTO using a TomoFix plate. The
knees were divided into non-fracture (59 knees) and LHF (15 knees)
groups, and the LHF group was further divided into Takeuchi types
I, II, and III (seven, two, and six knees, respectively). The outcomes
were assessed pre-operatively and one year after OWHTO. Pre-operative
characteristics (age, gender and body mass index) showed no significant
difference between the two groups. The mean Japanese Orthopaedic
Association score was significantly improved one year after operation
regardless of the presence or absence of LHF (p = 0.0015, p <
0.001, respectively). However, six of seven type I cases had no
LHF-related complications; both type II cases had delayed union;
and of six type III cases, two had delayed union with correction
loss and one had overcorrection. These results suggest that Takeuchi
type II and III LHFs are structurally unstable compared with type
I. Cite this article:
It is unclear whether there is a limit to the amount of distal bone required to support fixation of supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures. This retrospective multicentre study evaluated lateral locked plating of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures and compared the results according to extension of the fracture distal with the proximal border of the femoral prosthetic component. Between 1999 and 2008, 89 patients underwent lateral locked plating of a supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fracture, of whom 61 patients with a mean age of 72 years (42 to 96) comprising 53 women, were available after a minimum follow-up of six months or until fracture healing. Patients were grouped into those with fractures located proximally (28) and those with fractures that extended distal to the proximal border of the femoral component (33). Delayed healing and nonunion occurred respectively in five (18%) and three (11%) of more proximal fractures, and in two (6%) and five (15%) of the fractures with distal extension (p = 0.23 for delayed healing; p = 0.72 for nonunion, Fisher’s exact test). Four construct failures (14%) occurred in more proximal fractures, and three (9%) in fractures with distal extension (p = 0.51). Of the two deep infections that occurred in each group, one resolved after surgical debridement and antibiotics, and one progressed to a nonunion. Extreme distal periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur are not a contra-indication to lateral locked plating. These fractures can be managed with internal fixation, with predictable results, similar to those seen in more proximal fractures.
