To evaluate the perioperative complications associated with total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) in patients with spinal tumours, based on the extent and level of tumour resection. In total, 307 patients who underwent TES in a single centre were reviewed retrospectively. There were 164 male and 143 female patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 52.9 years (SD 13.3). A total of 225 patients were operated on for spinal metastases, 34 for a malignant primary tumour, 41 for an aggressive benign tumour, and seven with a primary of unknown origin. The main lesion was located in the thoracic spine in 213, and in the lumbar spine in 94 patients. There were 97 patients who underwent TES for more than two consecutive vertebrae.Aims
Methods
Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws is a
well-established technique, however, no studies have compared percutaneous
and open placement of screws in the thoracic spine. The aim of this
cadaveric study was to compare the accuracy and safety of these
techniques at the thoracic spinal level. A total of 288 screws were
inserted in 16 (eight cadavers, 144 screws in percutaneous and eight
cadavers, 144 screws in open). Pedicle perforations and fractures
were documented subsequent to wide laminectomy followed by skeletalisation
of the vertebrae. The perforations were classified as grade 0: no
perforation, grade 1: <
2 mm perforation, grade 2: 2 mm to 4
mm perforation and grade 3: >
4 mm perforation. In the percutaneous
group, the perforation rate was 11.1% with 15 (10.4%) grade 1 and
one (0.7%) grade 2 perforations. In the open group, the perforation
rate was 8.3% (12 screws) and all were grade 1. This difference
was not significant (p = 0.45). There were 19 (13.2%) pedicle fractures
in the percutaneous group and 21 (14.6%) in the open group (p =
0.73). In summary, the safety of percutaneous fluoroscopy-guided
pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine between T4 and T12
is similar to that of the conventional open technique. Cite this article:
