The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of spinal instrumentation in haemodialyzed patients with native pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Spinal instrumentation in these patients can be dangerous due to rates of complications and mortality, and biofilm formation on the instrumentation. A total of 134 haemodialyzed patients aged more than 50 years who underwent surgical treatment for pyogenic spondylodiscitis were included in the study. Their mean age was 66.4 years (50 to 83); 66 were male (49.3%) and 68 were female (50.7%). They were divided into two groups according to whether spinal instrumentation was used or not. Propensity score matching was used to attenuate the potential selection bias. The outcome of treatment was compared between these two groups.Aims
Patients and Methods
Few studies have examined the order in which
a spinal osteotomy and total hip replacement (THR) are to be performed
for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. We have retrospectively
reviewed 28 consecutive patients with ankylosing spondylitis who
underwent both a spinal osteotomy and a THR from September 2004
to November 2012. In the cohort 22 patients had a spinal osteotomy
before a THR (group 1), and six patients had a THR before a spinal
osteotomy (group 2). The mean duration of follow-up was 3.5 years
(2 to 9). The spinal sagittal Cobb angle of the vertebral osteotomy
segment was corrected from a pre-operative kyphosis angle of 32.4
(SD 15.5°) to a post-operative lordosis 29.6 (SD 11.2°) (p <
0.001). Significant improvements in pain, function and range of
movement were observed following THR. In group 2, two of six patients
had an early anterior dislocation. The spinal osteotomy was performed
two weeks after the THR. At follow-up, no hip has required revision
in either group. Although this non-comparative study only involved
a small number of patients, given our experience, we believe a spinal osteotomy
should be performed prior to a THR, unless the deformity is so severe
that the procedure cannot be performed. Cite this article:
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affects about
3% of children. Non-operative measures are aimed at altering the natural
history to maintain the size of the curve below 40° at skeletal
maturity. The application of braces to treat spinal deformity pre-dates
the era of evidence-based medicine, and there is a paucity of irrefutable
prospective evidence in the literature to support their use and
their effectiveness has been questioned. This review considers this evidence. The weight of the evidence
is in favour of bracing over observation. The most recent literature
has moved away from addressing this question, and instead focuses
on developments in the design of braces and ways to improve compliance. Cite this article:
