The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess and investigate the safety and efficacy of using a distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children. In this study, there were 59 consecutive tibial lengthening and deformity corrections in 57 children using a circular frame. All were performed or supervised by the senior author between January 2013 and June 2019. A total of 25 who underwent a distal tibial osteotomy were analyzed and compared to a group of 34 who had a standard proximal tibial osteotomy. For each patient, the primary diagnosis, time in frame, complications, and lengthening achieved were recorded. From these data, the frame index was calculated (days/cm) and analyzed.Aims
Methods
The traditional techniques involving an oblique
tunnel or triangular wedge resection to approach a central or mixed-type
physeal bar are hindered by poor visualisation of the bar. This
may be overcome by a complete transverse osteotomy at the metaphysis
near the growth plate or a direct vertical approach to the bar.
Ilizarov external fixation using small wires allows firm fixation
of the short physis-bearing fragment, and can also correct an associated angular
deformity and permit limb lengthening. We accurately approached and successfully excised ten central-
or mixed-type bars; six in the distal femur, two in the proximal
tibia and two in the distal tibia, without damaging the uninvolved
physis, and corrected the associated angular deformity and leg-length
discrepancy. Callus formation was slightly delayed because of periosteal
elevation and stretching during resection of the bar. The resultant
resection of the bar was satisfactory in seven patients and fair
in three as assessed using a by a modified Williamson–Staheli classification. Cite this article:
In 1937 Blount described a series of 28 patients with ‘Tibia vara’. Since then, a number of deformities in the tibia and the femur have been described in association with this condition. We analysed 14 children with Blount’s disease who were entered into a cross-sectional study. Their mean age was 10 (2 to 18). They underwent a clinical assessment of the rotational profile of their legs and a CT assessment of the angle of anteversion of their hips (femoral version). We compared our results to previously published controls. A statistically significant increase in femoral anteversion was noted in the affected legs, with on average the femurs in patients with Blount’s disease being 26° more anteverted than those in previously published controls. We believe this to be a previously unrecognised component of Blount’s disease, and that the marked intoeing seen in the disease may be partly caused by internal femoral version, in addition to the well-recognised internal tibial version.
