The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the prognosis after early functional rehabilitation or traditional immobilization in patients who underwent operative or nonoperative treatment for rupture of the Achilles tendon. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to 3 June 2020, using keywords related to rupture of the Achilles tendon and rehabilitation. Data extraction was undertaken by independent reviewers and subgroup analyses were performed based on the form of treatment. Risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) were used as summary association measures.Aims
Methods
Dupuytren’s contracture is a benign, myoproliferative condition
affecting the palmar fascia that results in progressive contractures
of the fingers. Despite increased knowledge of the cellular and
connective tissue changes involved, neither a cure nor an optimum
form of treatment exists. The aim of this systematic review was
to summarize the best available evidence on the management of this
condition. A comprehensive database search for randomized controlled trials
(RCTs) was performed until August 2017. We studied RCTs comparing
open fasciectomy with percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA), collagenase
clostridium histolyticum (CCH) with placebo, and CCH with PNA, in
addition to adjuvant treatments aiming to improve the outcome of
open fasciectomy. A total of 20 studies, involving 1584 patients,
were included.Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to assess the quality and scope of the current cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) literature in the field of hand and upper limb orthopaedic surgery. We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE and the CEA Registry to identify CEAs that were conducted on or after 1 January 1997, that studied a procedure pertaining to the field of hand and upper extremity surgery, that were clinical studies, and that reported outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years. We identified a total of 33 studies that met our inclusion criteria. The quality of these studies was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Analysis (QHES) scale.Aims
Materials and Methods
