Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 26
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 3 | Pages 224 - 226
1 Mar 2024
Ferguson D Perry DC


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 7 | Pages 642 - 645
1 Jul 2024
Harris IA Sidhu VS MacDessi SJ Solomon M Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 5 Supple B | Pages 1 - 2
1 May 2024
Berry DJ Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 5 | Pages 422 - 424
1 May 2024
Theologis T Perry DC

In 2017, the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery engaged the profession and all relevant stakeholders in two formal research prioritization processes. In this editorial, we describe the impact of this prioritization on funding, and how research in children’s orthopaedics, which was until very recently a largely unfunded and under-investigated area, is now flourishing. Establishing research priorities was a crucial step in this process.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):422–424.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1203 - 1205
1 Nov 2024
Taylor LA Breslin MA Hendrickson SB Vallier HA Ollivere BJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 8 | Pages 833 - 836
1 Aug 2023
Mancino F Gant V Meek DRM Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1642 - 1645
1 Nov 2021
Kayani B Giebaly D Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1439 - 1441
1 Sep 2021
Robinson JR Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 4 | Pages 597 - 599
1 Apr 2021
Kader DF Oussedik S Kader N Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1274 - 1276
3 Oct 2020
Tsang SJ Eyre DW Atkins BL Simpson AHRW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1277 - 1278
1 Oct 2020
Hughes R Hallstrom B Schemanske C Howard PW Wilton T


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 6 | Pages 658 - 660
1 Jun 2020
Judge A Metcalfe D Whitehouse MR Parsons N Costa M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 4 | Pages 403 - 406
1 Apr 2020
Trompeter A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1466 - 1468
1 Dec 2019
Ramasamy A Humphrey J Robinson AHN


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1177 - 1178
1 Oct 2019
Troelsen A Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 6 | Pages 625 - 626
1 Jun 2019
Price AJ Haddad FS Beard DJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 4 | Pages 413 - 414
1 Apr 2018
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 8 | Pages 993 - 995
1 Aug 2017
Skinner JA Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 3 | Pages 291 - 294
1 Mar 2017
Javaid MK Handley R Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1427 - 1430
1 Nov 2016
Powell JM Rai A Foy M Casey A Dabke H Gibson A Hutton M

Many hospitals do not have a structured process of consent, the attainment of which can often be rather ‘last-minute’ and somewhat chaotic. This is a surprising state of affairs as spinal surgery is a high-risk surgical specialty with potential for expensive litigation claims. More recently, the Montgomery ruling by the United Kingdom Supreme Court has placed the subject of informed consent into the spotlight.

There is a paucity of practical guidance on how a consent process can be achieved in a busy clinical setting. The British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has convened a working party to address this need. To our knowledge this is the first example of a national professional body, representing a single surgical specialty, taking such a fundamental initiative.

In a hard-pressed clinical environment, the ability to achieve admission reliably on the day of surgery, in patients at ease with their situation and with little likelihood of late cancellation, will be of great benefit. It will reduce litigation and improve the patient experience.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1427–30.