The primary purpose of this study of metal-on-metal
(MoM) hip resurfacing was to compare the effect of using a cementless
or cemented femoral component on the subsequent bone mineral density
(BMD) of the femoral neck. . This was a single-centre, prospective, double-blinded control
trial which
The ideal bearing surface for young patients
undergoing total hip replacement (THR) remains controversial. We report
the five-year results of a
Most published
We have undertaken a prospective,
In a double-blinded
This was a
The ideal acetabular component is characterised by reliable, long-term fixation with physiological loading of bone and a low rate of wear. Trabecular metal is a porous construct of tantalum which promotes bony ingrowth, has a modulus of elasticity similar to that of cancellous bone, and should be an excellent material for fixation. Between 2004 and 2006, 55 patients were
The best treatment for the active and lucid elderly patient with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck is still controversial. Randomised controlled trials have shown that a primary total hip replacement is superior to internal fixation as regards the need for secondary surgery, hip function and health-related quality of life. Despite good results achieved with total hip replacement in this group, most orthopaedic surgeons still advocate hemiarthroplasty for this injury. We studied 120 patients with a mean age of 81 years (70 to 90) with an acute displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. They were randomly allocated to be treated with either a bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. Outcome measurements included peri-operative data, general and hip-specific complications, hip function and health-related quality of life. The patients were reviewed at four and 12 months. The duration of surgery was longer in the total hip replacement group (102 minutes (70 to 151)) These results indicate that a total hip replacement provides better function than a bipolar hemiarthroplasty as soon as one year post-operatively, without increasing the complication rate. We recommend total hip replacement as the primary treatment for this group of patients.
Aims. Post-operative migration of cemented acetabular components as
measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) has a strong predictive
power for late, aseptic loosening. Also, radiolucent lines predict
late loosening. Migration has been reduced by systemic bisphosphonate
treatment in
Aims. We present the ten-year data of a cohort of patients, aged between
18 and 65 years (mean age 52.7 years; 19 to 64), who underwent total
hip arthroplasty. Patients were
Only limited data are available regarding the
infiltration of local anaesthetic for total hip arthroplasty (THA),
and no studies were performed for THA using the anterior approach. . In this prospective,
Tranexamic acid (TXA), an inhibitor of fibrinolysis,
reduces blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. However, its effect
on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not clear.
We performed a prospective,
The long term biological effects of wear products
following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are unclear. However, the indications
for THA are expanding, with increasingly younger patients undergoing
the procedure. This prospective,
There is currently limited information available
on the benefits and risks of extended thromboprophylaxis after hip fracture
surgery. SAVE-HIP3 was a
We hypothesised that the removal of the subchondral
bone plate (SCBP) for cemented acetabular component fixation in
total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers advantages over retention by
improving the cement-bone interface, without jeopardising implant
stability. We have previously published two-year follow-up data
of a
We undertook a
Aims . The primary aim of this independent prospective
We undertook a
Aims. The most effective surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty
(THA) remains controversial. The direct anterior approach may be
associated with a reduced risk of dislocation, faster recovery,
reduced pain and fewer surgical complications. This systematic review
aims to evaluate the current evidence for the use of this approach
in THA. Materials and Methods. Following the Cochrane collaboration, an extensive literature
search of PubMed, Medline, Embase and OvidSP was conducted. Randomised
controlled trials, comparative studies, and cohort studies were
included. Outcomes included the length of the incision, blood loss,
operating time, length of stay, complications, and gait analysis. Results. A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were of
medium to low quality. There was no difference between the direct
anterior, anterolateral or posterior approaches with regards to
length of stay and gait analysis. Papers comparing the length of the incision found similar lengths
compared with the lateral approach, and conflicting results when
comparing the direct anterior and posterior approaches. . Most studies found the mean operating time to be significantly
longer when the direct anterior approach was used, with a steep
learning curve reported by many. Many authors used validated scores including the Harris hip score,
and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index.
These mean scores were better following the use of the direct anterior
approach for the first six weeks post-operatively. Subsequently
there was no difference between these scores and those for the posterior
approach. Conclusion . There is little evidence for improved kinematics or better long-term
outcomes following the use of the direct anterior approach for THA.
There is a steep learning curve with similar rates of complications,
length of stay and outcomes. . Well-designed, multi-centre, prospective
We carried out a prospective