Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the pain caused by the application
of a tourniquet after exsanguination of the upper limb with that
occurring after simple elevation. . Patients and Methods. We used 26 healthy volunteers (52 arms), each of whom acted as
their own matched control. The primary outcome measure was the total pain experienced by
each volunteer while the tourniquet was inflated for 20 minutes.
This was calculated as the area under the pain curve for each individual
subject. Secondary outcomes were pain at each time point; the total
pain experienced during the recovery phase; the ability to tolerate the
tourniquet and the time for full recovery after deflation of the
tourniquet. . Results. There was a significant difference in the area under the pain
curves in favour of exsanguination (mean difference 8.4; 95% confidence
interval (CI) 3.0 to 13.7, p = 0.004). There was no difference between
the dominant and non-dominant arms (mean difference -0.2; 95% CI
-23.2 to 22.8, p = 0.99). The area under both recovery curves were similar
(mean difference 0.7; 95% CI -6.0 to 4.6, p = 0.78). There was no
statistical difference in recovery time, the actual mean difference
being 30 seconds longer in the elevation group (p = 0.06). Conclusion. Many orthopaedic and