There is no level I evidence dealing with the optimal period of immobilization for patients with a displaced distal radial fracture following closed reduction. A shorter period might lead to a better functional outcome due to less stiffness and pain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this period could be safely reduced from six to four weeks. This multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) included adult patients with a displaced distal radial fracture, who were randomized to be treated with immobilization in a cast for four or six weeks following closed reduction. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score after follow-up at one year. Secondary outcomes were the abbreviated version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score after one year, the functional outcome at six weeks, 12 weeks, and six months, range of motion (ROM), the level of pain after removal of the cast, and complications.Aims
Methods
It is not clear which type of casting provides the best initial treatment in adults with a distal radial fracture. Given that between 32% and 64% of adequately reduced fractures redisplace during immobilization in a cast, preventing redisplacement and a disabling malunion or secondary surgery is an aim of treatment. In this study, we investigated whether circumferential casting leads to fewer fracture redisplacements and better one-year outcomes compared to plaster splinting. In a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, two-period cluster-randomized superiority trial, we compared these two types of casting. Recruitment took place in ten hospitals. Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years with a displaced distal radial fracture, which was acceptably aligned after closed reduction, were included. The primary outcome measure was the rate of redisplacement within five weeks of immobilization. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes at three months, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores), and adverse events such as the development of compartment syndrome during one year of follow-up. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression for the analysis of the primary outcome measure.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score in patients treated with a volar locking plate for a distal radial fracture. This study was a retrospective review of a prospective database of 155 patients who underwent internal fixation with a volar locking plate for a distal radial fracture between August 2014 and April 2017. Data which were collected included postoperative PROMs (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)), and SANE scores at one month (n = 153), two months (n = 155), three months (n = 144), six months (n = 128), and one year (n = 73) after operation. Patients with incomplete data were excluded from this study. Correlation and agreement between PROMs and SANE scores were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were carried out to identify correlations according to variables such as age, the length of follow-up, and subcategories of the PRWE score.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there
is no difference, from the payer perspective, in the cost of treatment
of a distal radial fracture in an elderly patient, aged >
65 years,
between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction (CR). Data relating to the treatment of these injuries in the elderly
between January 2007 and December 2015 were extracted using the
Humana and Medicare Advantage Databases. The primary outcome of
interest was the cost associated with treatment. Secondary analysis included
the cost of common complications. Statistical analysis was performed
using a non-parametric Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a corticosteroid injection for the
treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in patients with and without Raynaud’s
phenomenon. In a prospective study, 139 patients with CTS were treated with a corticosteroid
injection (10 mg triamcinolone acetonide); 34 had Raynaud’s phenomenon and 105
did not (control group). Grip strength, perception of touch with a Semmes-Weinstein
monofilament and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaires (BCTQ) were assessed at
baseline and at six, 12 and 24 weeks after the injection. The Cold Intolerance Severity
Score (CISS) questionnaire was also assessed at baseline and 24 weeks after the
injection.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the Push Ortho Thumb Brace
CMC and a custom-made orthosis in the treatment of patients with
primary osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb.
Our outcome measures were pain scores, tests of hand function, patient
satisfaction and patient preference. A multicentre crossover randomised controlled trial was conducted
which included 63 patients (44 women) with primary osteoarthritis
of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Of these, 59 patients
with a mean age of 60.1 years (standard deviation 8.2), completed
the study. Patients used both orthoses for two weeks with a two-week washout
period in-between. Pain was measured on a 10-cm visual analogue
scale. Hand function was assessed using the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function
test, Nine Hole Peg Test, key grip, pinch grip and Functional Index
for Hand Osteoarthritis. Patient preference was assessed using the
Dutch version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with
Assistive Technology score.Aims
Patients and Methods
