Total knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy are common
It has been suggested that mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty
(TKA) might lead to better outcomes by accommodating some femorotibial
rotational mismatch, thereby reducing contact stresses and polyethylene
wear. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a
difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing versions of a contemporary
TKA with respect to durability, range of movement (ROM) and function,
ten years postoperatively. A total of 240 patients who were enrolled in this randomized
controlled trial (RCT) underwent a primary cemented TKA with one
of three tibial components (all-polyethylene fixed-bearing, modular
metal-backed fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing). Patients were reviewed
at a median follow-up of ten years (IQR 9.2 to 10.4).Aims
Patients and Methods
We have investigated iatrogenic popliteal artery
injuries (PAI) during non arthroplasty knee surgery regarding mechanism
of injury, treatment and outcomes, and to identify successful strategies
when injury occurs. In all, 21 iatrogenic popliteal artery injuries in 21 patients
during knee surgery other than knee arthroplasty were identified
from the Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) between 1987 and 2011.
Prospective registry data were supplemented with case-records, including
long-term follow-up. In total, 13 patients suffered PAI during elective surgery
and eight during urgent surgery such as fracture fixation or tumour
resection. Nine injuries were detected intra-operatively, five within
12 to 48 hours and seven >
48 hours post-operatively (two days to
23 years). There were 19 open vascular and two endovascular surgical repairs.
Two patients died within six months of surgery. One patient required
amputation. Only six patients had a complete recovery of whom had
the vascular injury detected at time of injury and repaired by a
vascular surgeon. Patients sustaining vascular injury during elective
procedures are more likely to litigate (p = 0.029). We conclude that outcomes are poorer when there is a delay of
diagnosis and treatment, and that orthopaedic surgeons should develop
strategies to detect PAI early and ensure rapid access to vascular
surgical support. Cite this article:
Accurate, reproducible outcome measures are essential
for the evaluation of any orthopaedic procedure, in both clinical
practice and research. Commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have
drawbacks such as ‘floor’ and ‘ceiling’ effects, limitations of
worldwide adaptability and an inability to distinguish pain from
function. They are also unable to measure the true outcome of an
intervention rather than a patient’s perception of that outcome. Performance-based functional outcome tools may address these
problems. It is important that both clinicians and researchers are
aware of these measures when dealing with high-demand patients,
using a new intervention or implant, or testing a new rehabilitation
protocol. This article provides an overview of some of the clinically-validated
performance-based functional outcome tools used in the assessment
of patients undergoing hip and knee surgery. Cite this article:
