The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often
includes surgical debridement and filling the resultant void with antibiotic-loaded
polymethylmethacrylate cement, bone grafts or bone substitutes.
Recently, the use of bioactive glass to treat bone defects in infections
has been reported in a limited series of patients. However, no direct comparison
between this biomaterial and antibiotic-loaded bone substitute has
been performed. In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy
of surgical debridement and local application of the bioactive glass
S53P4 in a series of 27 patients affected by chronic osteomyelitis
of the long bones (Group A) with two other series, treated respectively
with an antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate compound
(Group B; n = 27) or a mixture of tricalcium phosphate and an antibiotic-loaded
demineralised bone matrix (Group C; n = 22). Systemic antibiotics
were also used in all groups. After comparable periods of follow-up, the control of infection
was similar in the three groups. In particular, 25 out of 27 (92.6%)
patients of Group A, 24 out of 27 (88.9%) in Group B and 19 out
of 22 (86.3%) in Group C showed no infection recurrence at means
of 21.8 (12 to 36), 22.1 (12 to 36) and 21.5 (12 to 36) months follow-up,
respectively, while Group A showed a reduced wound complication
rate. Our results show that patients treated with a bioactive glass
without local antibiotics achieved similar eradication of infection
and less drainage than those treated with two different antibiotic-loaded
calcium-based bone substitutes. Cite this article:
Platelet-leucocyte gel (PLG), a new biotechnological blood product, has hitherto been used primarily to treat chronic ulcers and to promote soft-tissue and bone regeneration in a wide range of medical fields. In this study, the antimicrobial efficacy of PLG against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) was investigated in a rabbit model of osteomyelitis. Autologous PLG was injected into the tibial canal after inoculation with Staph. aureus. The prophylactic efficacy of PLG was evaluated by microbiological, radiological and histological examination. Animal groups included a treatment group that received systemic cefazolin and a control group that received no treatment. Treatment with PLG or cefazolin significantly reduced radiological and histological severity scores compared to the control group. This result was confirmed by a significant reduction in the infection rate and the number of viable bacteria. Although not comparable to cefazolin, PLG exhibited antimicrobial efficacy in vivo and therefore represents a novel strategy to prevent bone infection in humans.
