The aim of this study was to describe the technique of distraction
osteogenesis followed by arthrodesis using internal fixation to
manage complex conditions of the ankle, and to present the results
of this technique. Between 2008 and 2014, distraction osteogenesis followed by arthrodesis
using internal fixation was performed in 12 patients with complex
conditions of the ankle due to trauma or infection. There were eight
men and four women: their mean age was 35 years (23 to 51) at the
time of surgery. Bone healing and functional recovery were evaluated
according to the criteria described by Paley. Function was assessed
using the ankle-hindfoot scale of the American Orthopedic Foot and
Ankle Society (AOFAS).Aims
Patients and Methods
Achieving arthrodesis of the ankle can be difficult
in the presence of infection, deformity, poor soft tissues and bone loss.
We present a series of 48 patients with complex ankle pathology,
treated with the Ilizarov technique. Infection was present in 30
patients and 30 had significant deformity before surgery. Outcome
was assessed clinically and with patient-reported outcome measures
(Modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (MAOFAS) scale and
the Short-Form (SF-36)). Arthrodesis was achieved in 40 patients with the Ilizarov technique
alone and in six further patients with additional surgery. Infection
was eradicated in all patients at a mean follow-up of 46.6 months
(13 to 162). Successful arthrodesis was less likely in those with
comorbidities and in tibiocalcaneal fusion compared with tibiotalar
fusion. These patients had poor general health scores compared with the
normal population before surgery. The mean MAOFAS score improved
significantly from 24.3 (0 to 90) pre-operatively to 56.2 (30 to
90) post-operatively, but there was only a modest improvement in
general health; the mean SF-36 improved from 44.8 (19 to 66) to
50.1 (21 to 76). There was a major benefit in terms of pain relief. Arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique is an effective treatment
for complex ankle pathology, with good clinical outcomes and eradication
of infection. However, even after successful arthrodesis general
health scores remain limited. Cite this article:
