Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice. A consensus exercise was conducted involving all the major stakeholders in the patient journey for those with musculoskeletal injury. The consensus exercise primary aim was to seek agreement on a standardized set of terminology for weightbearing instructions.Aims
Methods
We report the results of six trauma and orthopaedic
projects to Kenya in the last three years. The aims are to deliver both
a trauma service and teaching within two hospitals; one a district
hospital near Mount Kenya in Nanyuki, the other the largest public
hospital in Kenya in Mombasa. The Kenya Orthopaedic Project team
consists of a wide range of multidisciplinary professionals that
allows the experience to be shared across those specialties. A follow-up
clinic is held three months after each mission to review the patients.
To our knowledge there are no reported outcomes in the literature
for similar projects. A total of 211 operations have been performed and 400 patients
seen during the projects. Most cases were fractures of the lower
limb; we have been able to follow up 163 patients (77%) who underwent
surgical treatment. We reflect on the results so far and discuss
potential improvements for future missions.
Surgeons need to be able to measure angles and distances in three dimensions in the planning and assessment of knee replacement. Computed tomography (CT) offers the accuracy needed but involves greater radiation exposure to patients than traditional long-leg standing radiographs, which give very little information outside the plane of the image. There is considerable variation in CT radiation doses between research centres, scanning protocols and individual scanners, and ethics committees are rightly demanding more consistency in this area. By refining the CT scanning protocol we have reduced the effective radiation dose received by the patient down to the equivalent of one long-leg standing radiograph. Because of this, it will be more acceptable to obtain the three-dimensional data set produced by CT scanning. Surgeons will be able to document the impact of implant position on outcome with greater precision.
