Patients undergoing femoral lengthening by external fixation
tolerate treatment less well when compared to tibial lengthening.
Lengthening of the femur with an intramedullary device may have
advantages. We reviewed all cases of simple femoral lengthening performed
at our unit from 2009 to 2014. Cases of nonunions, concurrent deformities,
congenital limb deficiencies and lengthening with an unstable hip
were excluded, leaving 33 cases (in 22 patients; 11 patients had
bilateral procedures) for review. Healing index, implant tolerance
and complications were compared.Aims
Patients and Methods
Internal lengthening devices in the femur lengthen
along the anatomical axis, potentially creating lateral shift of
the mechanical axis. We aimed to determine whether femoral lengthening
along the anatomical axis has an inadvertent effect on lower limb
alignment. Isolated femoral lengthening using the Intramedullary
Skeletal Kinetic Distractor was performed in 27 femora in 24 patients
(mean age 32 years (16 to 57)). Patients who underwent simultaneous realignment
procedures or concurrent tibial lengthening, or who developed mal-
or nonunion, were excluded. Pre-operative and six-month post-operative
radiographs were used to measure lower limb alignment. The mean lengthening
achieved was 4.4 cm (1.5 to 8.0). In 26 of 27 limbs, the mechanical
axis shifted laterally by a mean of 1.0 mm/cm of lengthening (0
to 3.5). In one femur that was initially in varus, a 3 mm medial
shift occurred during a lengthening of 2.2 cm. In a normally aligned limb, intramedullary lengthening along
the anatomical axis of the femur results in a lateral shift of the
mechanical axis by approximately 1 mm for each 1 cm of lengthening.
