The success rates of two-stage revision arthroplasty for infection have evolved since their early description. The implementation of internationally accepted outcome criteria led to the readjustment of such rates. However, patients who do not undergo reimplantation are usually set aside from these calculations. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of two-stage revision arthroplasty when considering those who do not undergo reimplantation, and to investigate the characteristics of this subgroup. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with chronic hip or knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with two-stage revision between January 2010 and October 2018, with a minimum follow-up of one year, were included. Variables including demography, morbidity, microbiology, and outcome were collected. The primary endpoint was the eradication of infection. Patients who did not undergo reimplantation were analyzed in order to characterize this subgroup better.Aims
Methods
We investigated changes in the axial alignment of the ipsilateral
hip and knee after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We reviewed 152 patients undergoing primary THA (163 hips; 22
hips in men, 141 hips in women) without a pre-operative flexion
contracture. The mean age was 64 years (30 to 88). The diagnosis
was osteoarthritis (OA) in 151 hips (primary in 18 hips, and secondary
to dysplasia in 133) and non-OA in 12 hips. A posterolateral approach
with repair of the external rotators was used in 134 hips and an
anterior approach in 29 hips. We measured changes in leg length
and offset on radiographs, and femoral anteversion, internal rotation
of the hip and lateral patellar tilt on CT scans, pre- and post-operatively. Aims
Patients and Methods
