Patients with pain and loss of shoulder function
due to nonunion of a fracture of the proximal third of the humerus may
benefit from reverse total shoulder replacement. This paper reports
a prospective, multicentre study, involving three hospitals and
three surgeons, of 35 patients (28 women, seven men) with a mean
age of 69 years (46 to 83) who underwent a reverse total shoulder
replacement for the treatment of nonunion of a
Aims. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of reverse shoulder
arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with type 1 sequelae of a fracture
of the proximal humerus in association with rotator cuff deficiency
or severe stiffness of the shoulder. Patients and Methods. A total of 38 patients were included: 28 women and ten men. Their
mean age at the time of arthroplasty was 73 years (54 to 91). Before
the RSA, 18 patients had been treated with open reduction and internal
fixation following a fracture. A total of 22 patients had a rotator
cuff tear and 11 had severe stiffness of the shoulder with < 0°
of external rotation. The mean follow-up was 4.3 years (1.5 to 10).
The Constant score and the range of movement of the shoulder were
recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up. Preoperatively, radiographs in two planes were performed, as
well as CT or arthro-CT scans; radiographs were also performed at
final follow-up. Results. The mean Constant score improved from 25 points (5 to 47) preoperatively
to 57 points (15 to 81) postoperatively. The mean forward elevation
of the shoulder increased from 73° (10° to 130°) preoperatively
to 117° (15° to 170°) postoperatively. Previous surgery did not
influence the outcome. Patients with rotator cuff tears had lower
Constant scores than patients without (p = 0.037). Those with preoperative
stiffness of the shoulder had lower postoperative external rotation
compared with patients without stiffness (p = 0.046). There was
no radiographic evidence of loosening. Three complications occurred,
leading to revision surgery in two patients. In all, 17 patients
rated their result as very good (45%), another 17 as good (45%),
two as satisfactory (5%), and two as unsatisfactory (5%). Discussion. RSA is an effective form of treatment for patients with type
1 sequelae of a
Failed internal fixation of a fracture of the
proximal humerus produces many challenges with limited surgical options.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after
the use of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty under these circumstances.
Between 2007 and 2012, 19 patients (15 women and four men, mean
age 66 years; 52 to 82) with failed internal fixation after a proximal
humeral fracture, underwent implant removal and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
(RSA). The mean follow-up was 36 months (25 to 60). The mean American
Shoulder and Elbow Score improved from 27.8 to 50.1 (p = 0.019).
The mean Simple Shoulder Test score improved from 0.7 to 3.2 (p
= 0.020), and the mean visual analogue scale for pain improved from
6.8 to 4.3 (p = 0.012). Mean forward flexion improved from 58.7°
to 101.1° (p <
0.001), mean abduction from 58.7° to 89.1° (p
= 0.012), mean external rotation from 10.7° to 23.1° (p = 0.043)
and mean internal rotation from buttocks to L4 (p = 0.034). A major
complication was recorded in five patients (26%) (one intra-operative
fracture, loosening of the humeral component in two and two peri-prosthetic
fractures). A total of 15 patients (79%) rated their outcome as
excellent or good, one (5%) as satisfactory, and three (16%) as
unsatisfactory. An improvement in outcomes and pain can be expected when performing
a RSA as a salvage procedure after failed internal fixation of a
fracture of the proximal humerus. Patients should be cautioned about
the possibility for major complications following this technically
demanding procedure. Cite this article:
Aims. Restoring the pre-morbid anatomy of the proximal humerus is a
goal of anatomical shoulder arthroplasty, but reliance is placed
on the surgeon’s experience and on anatomical estimations. The purpose
of this study was to present a novel method, ‘Statistical Shape
Modelling’, which accurately predicts the pre-morbid proximal humeral anatomy
and calculates the 3D geometric parameters needed to restore normal
anatomy in patients with severe degenerative osteoarthritis or a
fracture of the proximal humerus. Materials and Methods. From a database of 57 humeral CT scans 3D humeral reconstructions
were manually created. The reconstructions were used to construct
a statistical shape model (SSM), which was then tested on a second
set of 52 scans. For each humerus in the second set, 3D reconstructions
of four diaphyseal segments of varying lengths were created. These
reconstructions were chosen to mimic severe osteoarthritis, a fracture
of the surgical neck of the humerus and a proximal humeral fracture
with diaphyseal extension. The SSM was then applied to the diaphyseal
segments to see how well it predicted proximal morphology, using
the actual proximal humeral morphology for comparison. Results. With the metaphysis included, mimicking osteoarthritis, the errors
of prediction for retroversion, inclination, height, radius of curvature
and posterior and medial offset of the head of the humerus were
2.9° (± 2.3°), 4.0° (± 3.3°), 1.0 mm (± 0.8 mm), 0.8 mm (± 0.6 mm),
0.7 mm (± 0.5 mm) and 1.0 mm (± 0.7 mm), respectively. With the
metaphysis excluded, mimicking a fracture of the surgical neck,
the errors of prediction for retroversion, inclination, height, radius
of curvature and posterior and medial offset of the head of the
humerus were 3.8° (± 2.9°), 3.9° (± 3.4°), 2.4 mm (± 1.9 mm), 1.3
mm (± 0.9 mm), 0.8 mm
(± 0.5 mm) and 0.9 mm (± 0.6 mm), respectively. Conclusion. This study reports a novel, computerised method that accurately
predicts the pre-morbid proximal humeral anatomy even in challenging
situations. This information can be used in the surgical planning
and operative reconstruction of patients with severe degenerative
osteoarthritis or with a
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of surgical repair to conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of chronic/degenerative tears of the rotator cuff. PubMed, Cochrane database, and Medline were searched for randomized controlled trials published until March 2018. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality, and data were extracted for statistical analysis. The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.Aims
Materials and Methods
The reasons for failure of a hemirthroplasty (HA) when used to
treat a proximal humeral fracture include displaced or necrotic
tuberosities, insufficient metaphyseal bone-stock, and rotator cuff
tears. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is often the only
remaining form of treatment in these patients. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the clinical outcome after conversions from a failed
HA to rTSA. A total of 35 patients, in whom a HA, as treatment for a fracture
of the proximal humerus, had failed, underwent conversion to a rTSA.
A total of 28 were available for follow-up at a mean of 61 months
(37 to 91), having been initially reviewed at a mean of 20 months
(12 to 36) postoperatively. Having a convertible design, the humeral
stem could be preserved in nine patients. The stem was removed in
the other 19 patients and a conventional rTSA was implanted. At
final follow-up, patients were assessed using the American Shoulder
and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant Score, and plain radiographs.Aims
Material and Methods
If a modular convertible total shoulder system
is used as a primary implant for an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty,
failure of the prosthesis or the rotator cuff can be addressed by
converting it to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), with retention
of the humeral stem and glenoid baseplate. This has the potential
to reduce morbidity and improve the results. In a retrospective study of 14 patients (15 shoulders) with a
mean age of 70 years (47 to 83) we reviewed the clinical and radiological
outcome of converting an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty (ASA)
to a RSA using a convertible prosthetic system (SMR system, Lima,
San Daniele, Italy). The mean operating time was 64 minutes (45 to 75). All humeral
stems and glenoid baseplates were found to be well-fixed and could
be retained. There were no intra-operative or early post-operative
complications and no post-operative infection. The mean follow-up was 43 months (21 to 83), by which time the
mean visual analogue scale for pain had decreased from 8 pre-operatively
to 1, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score from 12
to 76, the mean Oxford shoulder score from 3 to 39, the mean Western
Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Score from 1618 to 418 and
the mean Subjective shoulder value from 15 to 61. On radiological review, one patient had a lucency around the
humeral stem, two had stress shielding. There were no fatigue fractures
of the acromion but four cases of grade 1 scapular notching. The use of a convertible prosthetic system to revise a failed
ASA reduces morbidity and minimises the rate of complications. The
mid-term clinical and radiological results of this technique are
promising. Cite this article:
Inherent disadvantages of reverse shoulder arthroplasty
designs based on the Grammont concept have raised a renewed interest
in less-medialised designs and techniques. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)
with the fully-constrained, less-medialised, Bayley–Walker prosthesis performed
for the treatment of rotator-cuff-deficient shoulders with glenohumeral
arthritis. A total of 97 arthroplasties in 92 patients (53 women
and 44 men, mean age 67 years (standard deviation ( The Bayley–Walker prosthesis provides reliable pain relief and
reasonable functional improvement for patients with symptomatic
cuff-deficient shoulders. Compared with other designs of RSA, it
offers a modest improvement in forward elevation, but restores external
rotation to some extent and prevents scapular notching. A longer
follow-up is required to assess the survival of the prosthesis and
the clinical performance over time. Cite this article: