Orthopaedic and reconstructive surgeons are faced with large defects after the resection of malignant tumours of the sacrum. Spinopelvic reconstruction is advocated for resections above the level of the S1 neural foramina or involving the sacroiliac joint. Fixation may be augmented with either free vascularized fibular flaps (FVFs) or allograft fibular struts (AFSs) in a cathedral style. However, there are no studies comparing these reconstructive techniques. We reviewed 44 patients (23 female, 21 male) with a mean age of 40 years (SD 17), who underwent en bloc sacrectomy for a malignant tumour of the sacrum with a reconstruction using a total (n = 20), subtotal (n = 2), or hemicathedral (n = 25) technique. The reconstructions were supplemented with a FVF in 25 patients (57%) and an AFS in 19 patients (43%). The mean length of the strut graft was 13 cm (SD 4). The mean follow-up was seven years (SD 5).Aims
Methods
Accurate estimations of the risk of fracture due to metastatic bone disease in the femur is essential in order to avoid both under-treatment and over-treatment of patients with an impending pathological fracture. The purpose of the current retrospective in vivo study was to use CT-based finite element analyses (CTFEA) to identify a clear quantitative differentiating factor between patients who are at imminent risk of fracturing their femur and those who are not, and to identify the exact location of maximal weakness where the fracture is most likely to occur. Data were collected on 82 patients with femoral metastatic bone disease, 41 of whom did not undergo prophylactic fixation. A total of 15 had a pathological fracture within six months following the CT scan, and 26 were fracture-free during the five months following the scan. The Mirels score and strain fold ratio (SFR) based on CTFEA was computed for all patients. A SFR value of 1.48 was used as the threshold for a pathological fracture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values for Mirels score and SFR predictions were computed for nine patients who fractured and 24 who did not, as well as a comparison of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC of the ROC curves).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to validate the Mirels score in predicting
pathological fractures in metastatic disease of the lower limb. A total of 62 patients with confirmed metastatic disease met
the inclusion criteria. Of the 62 patients, 32 were female and 30
were male. The mean age of patients was 65 years (35 to 89). The
primary malignancy originated from the breast in 27 (44%) patients,
prostate in 15 (24%) patients, kidney in seven (11%), and lung in
four (6%) of patients. One patient (2%) had metastatic carcinoma
from the lacrimal gland, two patients (3%) had multiple myeloma,
one patient (2%) had lymphoma of bone, and five patients (8%) had
metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary. Plain radiographs at the
time of initial presentation were scored using Mirels system by
the four authors. The radiographic components of the score (anatomical
site, size, and radiographic appearance) were scored two weeks apart.
Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated with Fleiss’
kappa test. Bland-Altman plots were created to compare the variances
of the individual components of the score and the total Mirels score.Aims
Patients and Methods
