To compare the outcomes for trochanteric fractures treated with
a sliding hip screw (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail. A total of 400 patients with a trochanteric hip fracture were
randomised to receive a SHS or a cephalomedullary nail (Targon PFT).
All surviving patients were followed up to one year from injury.
Functional outcome was assessed by a research nurse blinded to the
implant used.Aims
Patients and Methods
Our aim, using English Hospital Episode Statistics data before
during and after the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial
(DRAFFT), was to assess whether the results of the trial affected
clinical practice. Data were grouped into six month intervals from July 2005 to
December 2014. All patient episodes in the National Health Service
involving emergency surgery for an isolated distal radial fracture
were included.Aims
Patients and Methods
In a randomised trial involving 598 patients
with 600 trochanteric fractures of the hip, the fractures were treated with
either a sliding hip screw (n = 300) or a Targon PF intramedullary
nail (n = 300). The mean age of the patients was 82 years (26 to
104). All surviving patients were reviewed at one year with functional
outcome assessed by a research nurse blinded to the treatment used.
The intramedullary nail was found to have a slightly increased mean
operative time (46 minutes ( In summary, both implants produced comparable results but there
was a tendency to better return of mobility for those treated with
the intramedullary nail.
