In a randomised controlled pragmatic trial we
investigated whether local infiltration analgesia would result in earlier
readiness for discharge from hospital after total knee replacement
(TKR) than patient-controlled
Aims. This non-blinded randomised controlled trial compared the effect
of patient-controlled
Despite new technologies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), approximately 20% of patients are dissatisfied. A major reason for dissatisfaction and revision surgery after TKA is persistent pain. The radiological grade of osteoarthritis (OA) preoperatively has been investigated as a predictor of the outcome after TKA, with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in the intensity of pain 12 months after TKA in relation to the preoperative radiological grade of OA alone, and the combination of the intensity of preoperative pain and radiological grade of OA. The preoperative data of 300 patients who underwent primary TKA were collected, including clinical information (age, sex, preoperative pain), psychological variables (depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, anticipated pain), and quantitative sensory testing (temporal summation, pressure pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation). The preoperative radiological severity of OA was graded according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification. Persistent pain in the knee was recorded 12 months postoperatively. Generalized linear models explored differences in postoperative pain according to the KL grade, and combined preoperative pain and KL grade. Relative risk models explored which preoperative variables were associated with the high preoperative pain/low KL grade group.Aims
Methods
Multimodal infiltration of local anaesthetic provides effective
control of pain in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
There is little information about the added benefits of posterior
capsular infiltration (PCI) using different combinations of local
anaesthetic agents. Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness
of the control of pain using multimodal infiltration with and without
infiltration of the posterior capsule of the knee. In a double-blind, randomised controlled trial of patients scheduled
for unilateral primary TKA, 86 were assigned to be treated with
multimodal infiltration with (Group I) or without (Group II) PCI.
Routine associated analgesia included the use of bupivacaine, morphine,
ketorolac and epinephrine. All patients had spinal anaesthesia and patient-controlled
analgesia (PCA) post-operatively. A visual analogue scale (VAS)
for pain and the use of morphine were recorded 24 hours post-operatively.
Side effects of the infiltration, blood loss, and length of stay
in hospital were recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
Intra-operative, peri-articular injection of
local anaesthesia is an increasingly popular way of controlling
pain following total knee replacement. The evidence from this study suggests that it is safe to use
peri-articular injection in combination with auto-transfusion of
blood from peri-articular drains during knee replacement surgery.
In a prospective multicentre study we investigated
variations in pain management used by knee arthroplasty surgeons
in order to compare the differences in pain levels among patients
undergoing total knee replacements (TKR), and to compare the effectiveness
of pain management protocols. The protocols, peri-operative levels
of pain and patient satisfaction were investigated in 424 patients
who underwent TKR in 14 hospitals. The protocols were highly variable
and peri-operative pain levels varied substantially, particularly
during the first two post-operative days. Differences in levels
of pain were greatest during the night after TKR, when visual analogue
scores ranged from 16.9 to 94.3 points. Of the methods of managing pain, the combined use of peri-articular
infiltration and nerve blocks provided better pain relief than other
methods during the first two post-operative days. Patients managed
with peri-articular injection plus nerve block, and epidural analgesia
were more likely to have higher satisfaction at two weeks after TKR.
This study highlights the need to establish a consistent pain management
strategy after TKR.
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical
outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after manipulation under
anaesthesia (MUA) for post-operative stiffness with a matched cohort
of TKA patients who did not requre MUA. In total 72 patients (mean age 59.8 years, 42 to 83) who underwent
MUA following TKA were identified from our prospective database
and compared with a matched cohort of patients who had undergone
TKA without subsequent MUA. Patients were evaluated for range of
movement (ROM) and clinical outcome scores (Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Short-Form Health Survey,
and Knee Society Clinical Rating System) at a mean follow-up of
36.4 months (12 to 120). MUA took place at a mean of nine weeks
(5 to 18) after TKA. In patients who required MUA, mean flexion
deformity improved from 10° (0° to 25°) to 4.4° (0° to 15°) (p <
0.001),
and mean range of flexion improved from 79.8° (65° to 95°) to 116°
(80° to 130°) (p <
0.001). There were no statistically significant
differences in ROM or functional outcome scores at three months,
one year, or two years between those who required MUA and those
who did not. There were no complications associated with manipulation At most recent follow-up, patients requiring MUA achieved equivalent
ROM and clinical outcome scores when compared with a matched control
group. While other studies have focused on ROM after manipulation,
the current study adds to current literature by supplementing this
with functional outcome scores. Cite this article:
Compartment syndrome is a rare complication of total knee arthroplasty that requires early recognition and prompt decompression in order to prevent long-term disability. We have found only one previous case report in the literature. We present a series of seven cases from four hospitals and five surgeons. Six of the cases resulted in the loss of at least one compartment, and one resulted in amputation. Four of the cases resulted in legal action. We suggest that important risk factors contributing to the development of this condition include complex surgery, soft-tissue compromise, previous surgery, and possibly vascular disease. Delay in the diagnosis and hence delay in decompression was common in our series, and in five cases appeared to be related to the use of a postoperative epidural infusion for pain relief. The presence of associated neurological compromise may have also been a significant factor in the delay to diagnosis in two cases.
We have performed a prospective double-blind, randomised controlled trial over two years to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intra-operative peri-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients undergoing medial unicondylar knee replacement. We randomised 90 patients into two equal groups. The study group received an injection of triamcinolone acetonide, bupivacaine, and epinephrine into the peri-articular tissues at the end of the operation. The control group received the same injection mixture but without the addition of triamcinolone. The peri-operative analgesic regimen was standardised. The study group reported a significant reduction in pain (p = 0.014 at 12 hours, p = 0.031 at 18 hours and p = 0.031 at 24 hours) and had a better range of movement (p = 0.023 at three months). There was no significant difference in the rate of infection and no incidence of tendon rupture in either group. The addition of corticosteroid to the peri-articular injection after unicondylar knee replacement had both immediate and short-term benefits in terms of relief from pain, and rehabilitation with no increased risk of infection.
We report the clinical and radiological results of a two- to three-year prospective randomised study which was designed to compare a minimally-invasive technique with a standard technique in total knee replacement and was undertaken between January 2004 and May 2007. The mini-midvastus approach was used on 50 patients (group A) and a standard approach on 50 patients (group B). The mean follow-up in both groups was 23 months (24 to 35). The functional outcome was better in group A up to nine months after operation, as shown by statistically significant differences in the mean function score, mean total score and the mean Oxford knee score (all, p = 0.05). Patients in group A had statistically significant greater early flexion (p = 0.04) and reached their greatest mean knee flexion of 126.5° (95° to 135°) 21 days after operation. However, at final follow-up there was no significant difference in the mean maximum flexion between the groups (p = 0.08). Technical errors were identified in six patients from group A (12%) on radiological evaluation. Based on these results, the authors currently use minimally-invasive techniques in total knee replacement in selected cases only.
