There is an increased risk of dislocation of the hip after the resection of a periacetabular tumour and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the defect in the hemipelvis. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and timing of dislocation and to identify its risk factors. To determine the dislocation rate, we conducted a retrospective single-institution study of 441 patients with a periacetabular tumour who had undergone a standard modular hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction between 2003 and 2019. After excluding ineligible patients, 420 patients were enrolled. Patient-specific, resection-specific, and reconstruction-specific variables were studied using univariate and multivariate analyses.Aims
Methods
We investigated the functional outcome in patients
who underwent reverse shoulder replacement (RSR) after removal of
a tumour of the proximal humerus. A total of 16 patients (ten women
and six men) underwent this procedure between 1998 and 2011 in our
hospital. Five patients died and one was lost to follow-up. Ten
patients were available for review at a mean follow-up of 46 months
(12 to 136). Eight patients had a primary and two patients a secondary
bone tumour. At final follow up the mean range of active movement was: abduction
78° (30° to 150°); flexion 98° (45° to 180°); external rotation
32° (10° to 60°); internal rotation 51° (10° to 80°). The mean Musculoskeletal
Tumor Society score was 77% (60% to 90%) and the mean Toronto Extremity
Salvage Score was 70% (30% to 91%). Two patients had a superficial
infection and one had a deep infection and underwent a two-stage
revision procedure. In two patients there was loosening of the RSR;
one dislocated twice. All patients had some degree of atrophy or
pseudo-atrophy of the deltoid muscle. Use of a RSR in patients with a tumour of the proximal humerus
gives acceptable results. Cite this article:
We undertook a cemental unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement in 131 patients with a mean age of 50 years (2 to 84). Primary malignant tumours were present in 54 patients and 67 had metastatic disease. In addition, eight patients had either lymphoma or myeloma and two had non-oncological disorders. The mean follow-up was 27 months (0 to 180). An acetabular revision was required later in 14 patients, 12 of whom had been under the age of 21 years at the time of insertion of their original prosthesis. The risk of acetabular revision in patients over 21 years of age was 8% at five years compared with 36% in those aged under 21 years. All the unipolar hips in this younger age group required revision within 11 years of the initial operation. We conclude that unipolar replacement should not be used in younger patients and should be avoided in patients with a life expectancy of more than five years.
