Worldwide rates of primary and revision total
knee arthroplasty (TKA) are rising due to increased longevity of
the population and the burden of osteoarthritis. Revision TKA is a technically demanding procedure generating
outcomes which are reported to be inferior to those of primary knee
arthroplasty, and with a higher risk of complication. Overall, the
rate of revision after primary arthroplasty is low, but the number
of patients currently living with a TKA suggests a large potential
revision healthcare burden. Many patients are now outliving their prosthesis, and consideration
must be given to how we are to provide the necessary capacity to
meet the rising demand for revision surgery and how to maximise
patient outcomes. The purpose of this review was to examine the epidemiology of,
and risk factors for, revision knee arthroplasty, and to discuss
factors that may enhance patient outcomes. Cite this article:
Partial knee arthroplasty (PKA), either medial
or lateral unicompartmental knee artroplasty (UKA) or patellofemoral arthroplasty
(PFA) are a good option in suitable patients and have the advantages
of reduced operative trauma, preservation of both cruciate ligaments
and bone stock, and restoration of normal kinematics within the
knee joint. However, questions remain concerning long-term survival.
The goal of this review article was to present the long-term results
of medial and lateral UKA, PFA and combined compartmental arthroplasty
for multicompartmental disease. Medium- and long-term studies suggest
reasonable outcomes at ten years with survival greater than 95% in
UKA performed for medial osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis, and similarly
for lateral Cite this article:
