It has been well documented in the arthroplasty literature that lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) contributes to abnormal spinopelvic motion. However, the relationship between the severity or pattern of hip osteoarthritis (OA) as measured on an anteroposterior (AP) pelvic view and spinopelvic biomechanics has not been well investigated. Therefore, the aim of the study is to examine the association between the severity and pattern of hip OA and spinopelvic motion. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Plain AP pelvic radiographs were reviewed to document the morphological characteristic of osteoarthritic hips. Lateral spine-pelvis-hip sitting and standing plain radiographs were used to measure sacral slope (SS) and pelvic femoral angle (PFA) in each position. Lumbar disc spaces were measured to determine the presence of DDD. The difference between sitting and standing SS and PFA were calculated to quantify spinopelvic motion (ΔSS) and hip motion (ΔPFA), respectively. Univariate analysis and Pearson correlation were used to identify morphological hip characteristics associated with changes in spinopelvic motion.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to determine if an increasing serum cobalt (Co) and/or chromium (Cr) concentration is correlated with a decreasing Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in patients who received the Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), and to evaluate the ten-year revision rate and show if sex, inclination angle, and Co level influenced the revision rate. A total of 62 patients with an ASR-HRA were included and monitored yearly postoperatively. At follow-up, serum Co and Cr levels were measured and the HHS and the HOOS were scored. In addition, preoperative patient and implant variables and the need for revision surgery were recorded. We used a linear mixed model to relate the serum Co and Cr levels to different patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). For the survival analyses we used the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model.Aims
Methods
Femoral revision after cemented total hip replacement
(THR) might include technical difficulties, following essential cement
removal, which might lead to further loss of bone and consequently
inadequate fixation of the subsequent revision stem. . Femoral impaction allografting has been widely used in revision
surgery for the acetabulum, and subsequently for the femur. In combination
with a primary cemented stem, impaction grafting allows for femoral
bone restoration through incorporation and remodelling of the impacted
morsellized bone graft by the host skeleton. Cavitary bone defects
affecting meta-physis and
One-stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has several advantages; however, resection of the proximal femur might be necessary to achieve higher success rates. We investigated the risk factors for resection and re-revisions, and assessed complications and subsequent re-revisions. In this single-centre, case-control study, 57 patients who underwent one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip and required resection of the proximal femur between 2009 and 2018 were identified. The control group consisted of 57 patients undergoing one-stage revision without bony resection. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any correlation with resection and the risk factors for re-revisions. Rates of all-causes re-revision, reinfection, and instability were compared between groups.Aims
Methods
This study reviewed the results of a cementless anatomical femoral component to give immediate post-operative stability, and with a narrow distal section in order not to contact the femoral cortex in the
The aim of this study was to determine whether fixation, as opposed to revision arthroplasty, can be safely used to treat reducible Vancouver B type fractures in association with a cemented collarless polished tapered femoral stem (the Exeter). This retrospective cohort study assessed 152 operatively managed consecutive unilateral Vancouver B fractures involving Exeter stems; 130 were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 22 with revision arthroplasty. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years (SD 2.6; 3.2 to 12.1). The primary outcome measure was revision of at least one component. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed. Regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for revision following ORIF. Secondary outcomes included any reoperation, complications, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and mortality.Aims
Methods
Femoral revision component subsidence has been identified as predicting early failure in revision hip surgery. This comparative cohort study assessed the potential risk factors of subsidence in two commonly used femoral implant designs. A comparative cohort study was undertaken, analyzing a consecutive series of patients following revision total hip arthroplasties using either a tapered-modular (TM) fluted titanium or a porous-coated cylindrical modular (PCM) titanium femoral component, between April 2006 and May 2018. Clinical and radiological assessment was compared for both treatment cohorts. Risk factors for subsidence were assessed and compared.Aims
Methods
We investigated patient characteristics and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral component revision and/or osteosynthesis. The study utilized data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) and information from patient records. We included all primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in Sweden since 1979, and undergoing further surgery due to Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fracture between 2001 and 2011. The primary outcome measure was any further reoperation between 2001 and 2013. Cross-referencing with the National Patient Register was performed in two stages, in order to identify all surgical procedures not recorded on the SHAR.Aims
Patients and Methods
We compared implant and patient survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with matched controls. This retrospective cohort study compared 4831 hips with IOPFF and 48 154 propensity score matched primary THAs without IOPFF implanted between 2004 and 2016, which had been recorded on a national joint registry. Implant and patient survival rates were compared between groups using Cox regression.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to estimate the 90-day risk of revision for periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with design features of cementless femoral stems, and to investigate the effect of a collar on this risk using a biomechanical A total of 337 647 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) from the United Kingdom National Joint Registry (NJR) were included in a multivariable survival and regression analysis to identify the adjusted hazard of revision for periprosthetic fracture following primary THA using a cementless stem. The effect of a collar in cementless THA on this risk was evaluated in an Aims
Materials and Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biological fixation of a 3D printed porous implant, with and without different hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings, in a canine model. A canine transcortical model was used to evaluate the characteristics of bone ingrowth of Ti6Al4V cylindrical implants fabricated using laser rapid manufacturing (LRM). At four and 12 weeks post-implantation, we performed histological analysis and mechanical push-out testing on three groups of implants: a HA-free control (LRM), LRM with precipitated HA (LRM-PA), and LRM with plasma-sprayed HA (LRM-PSHA).Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the stability of a new
short femoral stem compared with a conventional femoral stem in
patients undergoing cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), in
a prospective randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric
analysis (RSA). A total of 53 patients were randomized to receive cementless
THA with either a short femoral stem (MiniHip, 26 patients, mean
age: 52 years, nine male) or a conventional length femoral stem
(MetaFix, 23 patients, mean age: 53 years, 11 male). All patients
received the same cementless acetabular component. Two-year follow-up
was available on 38 patients. Stability was assessed through migration
and dynamically inducible micromotion. Radiographs for RSA were
taken postoperatively and at three, six, 12, 18, and 24 months.Aims
Patients and Methods
Modular or custom-made femoral components have been preferred
for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with a history of Perthes’
disease because of the distortion in the anatomy of the proximal
femur. However, it has not been established whether a monobloc cementless
stem will fit the distorted proximal femur or whether the results
of the procedure are satisfactory in this group of patients. We reviewed 68 consecutive patients who had undergone THA for
childhood Perthes’ disease between June 2003 and December 2008.
There were 35 men and 33 women with a mean age of 48 years (16 to
73) at the time of index arthroplasty. Their mean body mass index
was 24.4 (18.3 to 32.9). Of the 68 hips, 32 were classified as Stulberg
class III and 36 as class IV. The mean pre-operative shortening
of the affected leg was 17.2 mm (5 to 34). The minimum follow-up
was five years (mean 8.5 years; 5.2 to 10).Aims
Patients and Methods
Our aim was to evaluate the radiographic characteristics of patients
undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the potential of posterior
bony impingement using CT simulations. Virtual CT data from 112 patients who underwent THA were analysed.
There were 40 men and 72 women. Their mean age was 59.1 years (41
to 76). Associations between radiographic characteristics and posterior
bony impingement and the range of external rotation of the hip were
evaluated. In addition, we investigated the effects of pelvic tilt
and the neck/shaft angle and femoral offset on posterior bony impingement.Aims
Patients and Methods
If a surgeon is faced with altered lesser trochanter
anatomy when revising the femoral component in revision total hip
replacement, a peri-prosthetic fracture, or Paprosky type IIIb or
type IV femoral bone loss, a modular tapered stem offers the advantages
of accurately controlling femoral version and length. The splines
of the taper allow rotational control, and improve the fit in femoral
canals with diaphyseal bone loss. In general, two centimetres of diaphyseal
contact is all that is needed to gain stability with modular tapered
stems. By allowing the proximal body trial to rotate on a well-fixed
distal segment during trial reduction, appropriate anteversion can
be obtained in order to improve intra-operative stability, and decrease
the dislocation risk. However, modular stems should not be used for
all femoral revisions, as implant fracture and corrosion at modular
junctions can still occur. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to compare early functional and health
related quality of life outcomes (HRQoL) in patients who have undergone
total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a bone conserving short stem
femoral component and those in whom a conventional length uncemented
component was used. Outcome was assessed using a validated performance
based outcome instrument as well as patient reported outcome measures
(PROMs). We prospectively analysed 33 patients whose THA involved a contemporary
proximally porous coated tapered short stem femoral component and
53 patients with a standard conventional femoral component, at a
minimum follow-up of two years. The mean follow-up was 31.4 months
(24 to 39). Patients with poor proximal femoral bone quality were
excluded. The mean age of the patients was 66.6 years (59 to 77)
and the mean body mass index was 30.2 kg/m2 (24.1 to
41.0). Outcome was assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and
the University College Hospital (UCH) hip score which is a validated
performance based instrument. HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQol
5D (EQ-5D).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to identify patient- and surgery-related
risk factors for sustaining an early periprosthetic fracture following
primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using a double-tapered
cementless femoral component (Bi-Metric femoral stem; Biomet Inc.,
Warsaw, Indiana). A total of 1598 consecutive hips, in 1441 patients receiving
primary THA between January 2010 and June 2015, were retrospectively
identified. Level of pre-operative osteoarthritis, femoral Dorr
type and cortical index were recorded. Varus/valgus placement of
the stem and canal fill ratio were recorded post-operatively. Periprosthetic
fractures were identified and classified according to the Vancouver
classification. Regression analysis was performed to identify risk
factors for early periprosthetic fracture.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the survivorship and radiographic
outcomes at ten-year follow-up of three prospective consecutive
series of patients each of which received a different design of
cementless femoral components for total hip arthroplasty (THA). In Cohort 1, 91 consecutive patients (100 hips) underwent THA
with a cementless porous-coated anatomic femoral stem (PCA) between
October 1983 and January 1986. In Cohort 2, 86 consecutive patients
(100 hips) underwent THA with an extensively porous-coated cementless
femoral stem (Prodigy) between June 1994 and October 1997. In Cohort
3, 88 consecutive patients (100 hips) underwent THA with a proximally
porous-coated triple-tapered cementless stem (Summit) between April
2002 and October 2003. All three groups underwent prospective clinical
and radiographic evaluation.Aims
Patients and Methods
There is an increased risk of fracture following
osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement
(FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head–neck junction
has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures
have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated
the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head–neck
junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control,
10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was
applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection
at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison
groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture
between the control group and the 10% resection group (p <
0.001).
The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before
failure (p <
0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection
(p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between
the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head–neck
junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity
of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone,
there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the
amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral
femoral head–neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify
their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to
minimise the subsequent fracture risk. Cite this article:
A possible solution for the management of proximal femoral bone
loss is a modular femoral endoprosthesis (EPR). Although the outcome
of EPRs in tumour surgery has been well described, the outcome of
their use in revision hip surgery has received less attention. The
aim of this study was to describe the outcome of using EPR for non-neoplastic
indications. A retrospective review of 79 patients who underwent 80 EPRs for
non-neoplastic indications was performed, including the rates of
complication and survival and the mean Oxford Hip Scores (OHS),
at a mean of five years post-operatively. The mean age at the time
of surgery was 69 years (28 to 93) and the mean number of previous operations
on the hip was 2.4 (0 to 17). The most common indications for EPR
implantation were periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 40),
periprosthetic fracture (n = 12) and failed osteosynthesis of a
proximal femoral fracture or complex trauma (n = 11).Objectives
Methods
