Chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease is sometimes treated with fusion. We compared the outcome of three different fusion techniques in the Swedish Spine Register: noninstrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF), and interbody fusion (IBF). A total of 2874 patients who were operated on at one or two lumbar levels were followed for a mean of 9.2 years (3.6 to 19.1) for any additional lumbar spine surgery. Patient-reported outcome data were available preoperatively (n = 2874) and at one year (n = 2274), two years (n = 1958), and a mean of 6.9 years (n = 1518) postoperatively and consisted of global assessment and visual analogue scales of leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol five-dimensional index, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and satisfaction with treatment. Statistical analyses were performed with competing-risks proportional hazards regression or analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline variables.Aims
Patients and Methods
There is little information about the optimum number of implants
to be used in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Retrospective
analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swedish spine
register was undertaken to discover whether more implants per operated
vertebra (implant density) leads to a better outcome in the treatment of
idiopathic scoliosis. The hypothesis was that implant density is
not associated with patient-reported outcomes, the correction of
the curve or the rate of reoperation. A total of 328 patients with idiopathic scoliosis, aged between
ten and 20 years at the time of surgery, were identified in the
Swedish spine register (Swespine) and had patient reported outcomes
including the Scoliosis Research Society 22r instrument (SRS-22r)
score, EuroQol 5 dimensions quality of life, 3 level (EQ-5D-3L)
score and a Viual Analogue Score (VAS) for back pain, at a mean
follow-up of 3.1 years and reoperation data at a mean follow-up
of 5.5 years. Implant data and the correction of the curve were
assessed from radiographs, preoperatively and a mean of 1.9 years
postoperatively. The patients were divided into tertiles based on
implant density. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, logistic
regression or log-rank test. Some analyses were adjusted for gender,
age at the time of surgery, the flexibility of the major curve and
follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
This is a prospective randomised study comparing
the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon
kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression
fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either
uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Self-reported clinical
assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris
Disability questionnaire and a visual analogue score for pain was undertaken
pre-operatively, and at three and twelve months post-operatively.
The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured from pre-
and post-operative radiographs. Total operating time and the incidence
of cement leakage was recorded for each group. Both uni- and bipedicular kyphoplasty groups showed significant
within-group improvements in all clinical outcomes at three months
and twelve months after surgery. However, there were no significant
differences between the groups in all clinical and radiological
outcomes. Operating time was longer in the bipedicular group (p <
0.001). The incidence of cement leakage was not significantly different
in the two groups (p = 0.09). A unipedicular technique yielded similar clinical and radiological
outcomes as bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty, while reducing the
length of the operation. We therefore encourage the use of a unipedicular
approach as the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of
osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Cite this article:
