The aim of this study was to examine whether hips with unilateral osteoarthritis (OA) secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) have significant asymmetry in femoral length, and to determine potential related factors. We enrolled 90 patients (82 female, eight male) with DDH showing unilateral OA changes, and 43 healthy volunteers (26 female, 17 male) as controls. The mean age was 61.8 years (39 to 93) for the DDH groups, and 71.2 years (57 to 84) for the control group. Using a CT-based coordinate measurement system, we evaluated the following vertical distances: top of the greater trochanter to the knee centre (femoral length GT), most medial prominence of the lesser trochanter to the knee centre (femoral length LT), and top of the greater trochanter to the medial prominence of the lesser trochanter (intertrochanteric distance), along with assessments of femoral neck anteversion and neck shaft angle.Aims
Patients and Methods
In patients where the proximal femur shows gross deformity due
to degenerative changes or fracture, the contralateral femur is
often used to perform preoperative templating for hip arthroplasty.
However, femurs may not be symmetrical: the aim of this study was
to determine the degree of variation between hips in healthy individuals and
to determine whether it is affected by demographic parameters. CT-scan based modelling was used to examine the pelvis and bilateral
femurs of 345 patients (211 males, 134 women; mean age 62 years
(standard deviation (Aims
Materials and Methods
The primary aim of this study was to define and quantify three
new measurements to indicate the position of the greater trochanter.
Secondary aims were to define ‘functional antetorsion’ as it relates
to abductor function in populations both with and without torsional
abnormality. Three new measurements, functional antetorsion, posterior tilt,
and posterior translation of the greater trochanter, were assessed
from 61 CT scans of cadaveric femurs, and their reliability determined.
These measurements and their relationships were also evaluated in
three groups of patients: a control group (n = 22), a ‘high-antetorsion’ group
(n = 22) and a ‘low-antetorsion’ group (n = 10).Aims
Patients and Methods
Version of the femoral stem is an important factor
influencing the risk of dislocation after total hip replacement (THR)
as well as the position of the acetabular component. However, there
is no radiological method of measuring stem anteversion described
in the literature. We propose a radiological method to measure stem
version and have assessed its reliability and validity. In 36 patients
who underwent THR, a hip radiograph and CT scan were taken to measure
stem anteversion. The radiograph was a modified Budin view. This
is taken as a posteroanterior radiograph in the sitting position
with 90° hip flexion and 90° knee flexion and 30° hip abduction.
The angle between the stem-neck axis and the posterior intercondylar
line was measured by three independent examiners. The intra- and
interobserver reliabilities of each measurement were examined. The
radiological measurements were compared with the CT measurements
to evaluate their validity. The mean radiological measurement was
13.36° ( Cite this article:
The aim of this retrospective cohort study was
to identify any difference in femoral offset as measured on pre-operative
anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the pelvis, AP radiographs of
the hip and corresponding CT scans in a consecutive series of 100
patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip (43 men
and 57 women with a mean age of 61 years (45 to 74) and a mean body
mass index of 28 kg/m2 (20 to 45)). Patients were positioned according to a standardised protocol
to achieve reproducible projection and all images were calibrated.
Inter- and intra-observer reliability was evaluated and agreement
between methods was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. In the entire cohort, the mean femoral offset was 39.0 mm (95%
confidence interval (CI) 37.4 to 40.6) on radiographs of the pelvis,
44.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 45.6) on radiographs of the hip and 44.7
mm (95% CI 43.5 to 45.9) on CT scans. AP radiographs of the pelvis
underestimated femoral offset by 13% when compared with CT (p <
0.001).
No difference in mean femoral offset was seen between AP radiographs
of the hip and CT (p = 0.191). Our results suggest that femoral offset is significantly underestimated
on AP radiographs of the pelvis but can be reliably and accurately
assessed on AP radiographs of the hip in patients with primary end-stage
hip osteoarthritis. We, therefore, recommend that additional AP radiographs of the
hip are obtained routinely for the pre-operative assessment of femoral
offset when templating before total hip replacement.
We evaluated an operative technique, described
by the Exeter Hip Unit, to assist accurate introduction of the femoral
component. We assessed whether it led to a reduction in the rate
of leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 100 patients undergoing THA were studied retrospectively;
50 were undertaken using the test method and 50 using conventional
methods as a control group. The groups were matched with respect
to patient demographics and the grade of surgeon. Three observers
measured the depth of placement of the femoral component on post-operative
radiographs and measured the length of the legs. There was a strong correlation between the depth of insertion
of the femoral component and the templated depth in the test group
(R = 0.92), suggesting accuracy of the technique. The mean leg-length
discrepancy was 5.1 mm (0.6 to 21.4) pre-operatively and 1.3 mm
(0.2 to 9.3) post-operatively. There was no difference between Consultants
and Registrars as primary surgeons. Agreement between the templated
and post-operative depth of insertion was associated with reduced
post-operative leg-length discrepancy. The intra-class coefficient
was R ≥ 0.88 for all measurements, indicating high observer agreement.
The post-operative leg-length discrepancy was significantly lower
in the test group (1.3 mm) compared with the control group (6.3
mm, p <
0.001). The Exeter technique is reproducible and leads to a lower incidence
of leg-length discrepancy after THA. Cite this article:
There have been several studies examining the
association between the morphological characteristics seen in acetabular
dysplasia and the incidence of the osteoarthritis (OA). However, most studies focus mainly on acetabular morphological
analysis, and few studies have scrutinised the effect of femoral
morphology. In this study we enrolled 36 patients with bilateral
acetabular dysplasia and early or mid-stage OA in one hip and no
OA in the contralateral hip. CT scans were performed from the iliac
crest to 2 cm inferior to the tibial tuberosity, and the morphological
characteristics of both acetabulum and femur were studied. In addition, 200 hips in 100 healthy volunteer Chinese adults
formed a control group. The results showed that the dysplastic group
with OA had a significantly larger femoral neck anteversion and
a significantly shorter abductor lever arm than both the dysplastic
group without OA and the controls. Femoral neck anteversion had
a significant negative correlation with the length of the abductor
lever arm and we conclude that it may contribute to the development
of OA in dysplastic hips. Cite this article:
Orientation of the native acetabular plane as defined by the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and the posterior labrum was measured intra-operatively using computer-assisted navigation in 39 hips. In order to assess the influence of alignment on impingement, the range of movement was calculated for that defined by the TAL and the posterior labrum and compared with a standard acetabular component position (abduction 45°/anteversion 15°). With respect to the registration of the plane defined by the TAL and the posterior labrum, there was moderate interobserver agreement (r = 0.64, p <
0.001) and intra-observer reproducibility (r = 0.73, p <
0.001). The mean acetabular component orientation achieved was abduction of 41° (32° to 51°) and anteversion of 18° (−1° to 36°). With respect to the Lewinnek safe zone (abduction 40° ±10°, anteversion 15° ±10°), 35 of the 39 acetabular components were within this zone. However, there was no improvement in the range of movement (p = 0.94) and no significant difference in impingement (p = 0.085). Alignment of the acetabular component with the TAL and the posterior labrum might reduce the variability of acetabular component placement in total hip replacement. However, there is only a moderate interobserver agreement and intra-observer reliability in the alignment of the acetabular component using the TAL and the posterior labrum. No reduction in impingement was found when the acetabular component was aligned with the TAL and the posterior labrum, compared with a standard acetabular component position.
We examined the morphology of mammalian hips asking whether evolution can explain the morphology of impingement in human hips. We describe two stereotypical mammalian hips, coxa recta and coxa rotunda. Coxa recta is characterised by a straight or aspherical section on the femoral head or head-neck junction. It is a sturdy hip seen mostly in runners and jumpers. Coxa rotunda has a round femoral head with ample head-neck offset, and is seen mostly in climbers and swimmers. Hominid evolution offers an explanation for the variants in hip morphology associated with impingement. The evolutionary conflict between upright gait and the birth of a large-brained fetus is expressed in the female pelvis and hip, and can explain pincer impingement in a coxa profunda. In the male hip, evolution can explain cam impingement in coxa recta as an adaptation for running.