Vascular compromise due to arterial injury is a rare but serious complication of a proximal humeral fracture. The aims of this study were to report its incidence in a large urban population, and to identify clinical and radiological factors which are associated with this complication. We also evaluated the results of the use of our protocol for the management of these injuries. A total of 3,497 adult patients with a proximal humeral fracture were managed between January 2015 and December 2022 in a single tertiary trauma centre. Their mean age was 66.7 years (18 to 103) and 2,510 (72%) were female. We compared the demographic data, clinical features, and configuration of those whose fracture was complicated by vascular compromise with those of the remaining patients. The incidence of vascular compromise was calculated from national population data, and predictive factors for its occurrence were investigated using univariate analysis.Aims
Methods
Supracondylar fractures are the most frequently occurring paediatric
fractures about the elbow and may be associated with a neurovascular
injury. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma
11 (BOAST 11) guidelines describe best practice for supracondylar
fracture management. This study aimed to assess whether emergency
departments in the United Kingdom adhere to BOAST 11 standard 1:
a documented assessment, performed on presentation, must include
the status of the radial pulse, digital capillary refill time, and
the individual function of the radial, median (including the anterior
interosseous), and ulnar nerves. Stage 1: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective audit of adherence
to BOAST 11 standard 1. Data were collected from eight hospitals
in the United Kingdom. A total of 433 children with Gartland type
2 or 3 supracondylar fractures were eligible for inclusion. A centrally
created data collection sheet was used to guide objective analysis
of whether BOAST 11 standard 1 was adhered to. Stage 2: We created
a quality improvement proforma for use in emergency departments.
This was piloted in one of the hospitals used in the primary audit
and was re-audited using equivalent methodology. In all, 102 patients
presenting between January 2016 and July 2017 were eligible for inclusion
in the re-audit.Aims
Materials and Methods
