Most posterior hindfoot procedures have been
described with the patient positioned prone. This affords excellent access
to posterior hindfoot structures but has several disadvantages for
the management of the airway, the requirement for an endotracheal
tube in all patients, difficulty with ventilation and an increased
risk of pressure injuries, especially with regard to reduced ocular
perfusion. We describe use of the ‘recovery position’, which affords equivalent
access to the posterior aspect of the ankle and hindfoot without
the morbidity associated with the prone position. A laryngeal mask
rather than endotracheal tube may be used in most patients. In this
annotation we describe this technique, which offers a safe and simple alternative
method of positioning patients for posterior hindfoot and ankle
surgery. Cite this article:
Van Nes rotationplasty may be used for patients
with congenital proximal focal femoral deficiency (PFFD). The lower
limb is rotated to use the ankle and foot as a functional knee joint
within a prosthesis. A small series of cases was investigated to
determine the long-term outcome. At a mean of 21.5 years (11 to
45) after their rotationplasty, a total of 12 prosthetic patients
completed the Short-Form (SF)-36, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, Harris
hip score, Oswestry back pain score and Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaires,
as did 12 age- and gender-matched normal control participants. A
physical examination and gait analysis, computerised dynamic posturography
(CDP), and timed ‘Up &
Go’ testing was also completed. Wilcoxon
Signed rank test was used to compare each PFFD patient with a matched
control participant with false discovery rate of 5%. There were no differences between the groups in overall health
and well-being on the SF-36. Significant differences were seen in
gait parameters in the PFFD group. Using CDP, the PFFD group had
reduced symmetry in stance, and reduced end point and maximum excursions. Patients who had undergone Van Nes rotationplasty had a high
level of function and quality of life at long-term follow-up, but
presented with significant differences in gait and posture compared
with the control group. Cite this article:
