This study aims to identify the top unanswered research priorities in the field of knee surgery using consensus-based methodology. Initial research questions were generated using an online survey sent to all 680 members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK). Duplicates were removed and a longlist was generated from this scoping exercise by a panel of 13 experts from across the UK who provided oversight of the process. A modified Delphi process was used to refine the questions and determine a final list. To rank the final list of questions, each question was scored between one (low importance) and ten (high importance) in order to produce the final list.Aims
Methods
This study compared the outcome of total knee
replacement (TKR) in adult patients with fixed- and mobile-bearing prostheses
during the first post-operative year and at five years’ follow-up,
using gait parameters as a new objective measure. This double-blind
randomised controlled clinical trial included 55 patients with mobile-bearing (n
= 26) and fixed-bearing (n = 29) prostheses of the same design,
evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at six weeks, three
months, six months, one year and five years. Each participant undertook
two walking trials of 30 m and completed the EuroQol questionnaire,
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index,
Knee Society score, and visual analogue scales for pain and stiffness.
Gait analysis was performed using five miniature angular rate sensors
mounted on the trunk (sacrum), each thigh and calf. The study population
was divided into two groups according to age (≤ 70 years Improvements in most gait parameters at five years’ follow-up
were greater for fixed-bearing TKRs in older patients (>
70 years),
and greater for mobile-bearing TKRs in younger patients (≤ 70 years).
These findings should be confirmed by an extended age controlled
study, as the ideal choice of prosthesis might depend on the age
of the patient at the time of surgery.
