To compare the functionality of adults with displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures treated either operatively or nonoperatively and to compare the relative risk of nonunion and reoperation between the two groups. Based on specific eligibility criteria, 120 adults (median age 37.5 years (interquartile range (18 to 61)) and 84% males (n = 101)) diagnosed with an acute displaced mid-shaft fracture were recruited, and randomized to either the operative (n = 60) or nonoperative (n = 60) treatment group. This randomized controlled, partially blinded trial followed patients for 12 months following initial treatment. Functionality was assessed by the Constant score (CS) (assessor blinded to treatment) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Clinical and radiological evaluation, and review of patient files for complications and reoperations, were added as secondary outcomes.Aims
Methods
Surgical site infection can be a devastating complication of
hemiarthroplasty of the hip, when performed in elderly patients
with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck. It results in a prolonged
stay in hospital, a poor outcome and increased costs. Many studies
have identified risk and prognostic factors for deep infection.
However, most have combined the rates of infection following total
hip arthroplasty and internal fixation as well as hemiarthroplasty, despite
the fact that they are different entities. The aim of this study
was to clarify the risk and prognostic factors causing deep infection
after hemiarthroplasty alone. Data were extracted from a prospective hip fracture database
and completed by retrospective review of the hospital records. A
total of 916 patients undergoing a hemiarthroplasty in two level
II trauma teaching hospitals between 01 January 2011 and
01 May 2016 were included. We analysed the potential peri-operative
risk factors with univariable and multivariable logistic regression
analysis.Aims
Patients and Methods
There has been extensive discussion about the
effect of delay to surgery on mortality in patients sustaining a fracture
of the hip. Despite the low level of evidence provided by many studies,
a consensus has been accepted that delay of >
48 hours is detrimental
to survival. The aim of this prospective observational study was
to determine if early surgery confers a survival benefit at 30 days. Between 1989 and 2013, data were prospectively collected on patients
sustaining a fracture of the hip at Peterborough City Hospital.
They were divided into groups according to the time interval between
admission and surgery. These thresholds ranged from <
6 hours
to between 49 and 72 hours. The outcome which was assessed was the
30-day mortality. Adjustment for confounders was performed using
multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. In all, 6638 patients
aged >
60 years were included. Worsening American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade (p <
0.001), increased age (p <
0.001) and extracapsular fracture
(p <
0.019) increased the risk of 30-day mortality. Increasing mobility score (p = 0.014), mini mental test score
(p <
0.001) and female gender (p = 0.014) improved survival.
After adjusting for these confounders, surgery before 12 hours improved
survival compared with surgery after 12 hours (p = 0.013). Beyond
this the increasing delay to surgery did not significantly affect
the 30-day mortality. Cite this article:
