Although patients with a history of venous thromboembolism
(VTE) who undergo lower limb joint replacement are thought to be
at high risk of further VTE, the actual rate of recurrence has not
been reported. The purpose of this study was to identify the recurrence rate
of VTE in patients who had undergone lower limb joint replacement,
and to compare it with that of patients who had undergone a joint
replacement without a history of VTE. From a pool of 6646 arthroplasty procedures (3344 TKR, 2907 THR,
243 revision THR, 152 revision TKR) in 5967 patients (68% female,
mean age 67.7; 21 to 96) carried out between 2009 and 2011, we retrospectively
identified 118 consecutive treatment episodes in 106 patients (65%
female, mean age 70; 51 to 88,) who had suffered a previous VTE.
Despite mechanical prophylaxis and anticoagulation with warfarin,
we had four recurrences by three months (3.4% of 118) and six by
one year (5.1% of 118). In comparison, in all our other joint replacements
the rate of VTE was 0.54% (35/6528). The relative risk of a VTE by 90 days in patients who had undergone
a joint replacement with a history of VTE compared with those with
a joint replacement and no history of VTE was 6.3 (95% confidence
interval, 2.3 to 17.5). There were five complications in the previous
VTE group related to bleeding or over-anticoagulation. Cite this article:
We compared lower limb coronal alignment measurements
obtained pre- and post-operatively with long-leg radiographs and
computer navigation in patients undergoing primary total knee replacement
(TKR). A series of 185 patients had their pre- and post-implant
radiological and computer-navigation system measurements of coronal alignment
compared using the Bland-Altman method. The study included 81 men
and 104 women with a mean age of 68.5 years (32 to 87) and a mean
body mass index of 31.7 kg/m2 (19 to 49). Pre-implant
Bland–Altman limits of agreement were -9.4° to 8.6° with a repeatability
coefficient of 9.0°. The Bland–Altman plot showed a tendency for the
radiological measurement to indicate a higher level of pre-operative
deformity than the corresponding navigation measurement. Post-implant
limits of agreement were -5.0° to 5.4° with a repeatability coefficient
of 5.2°. The tendency for valgus knees to have greater deformity
on the radiograph was still seen, but was weaker for varus knees. The alignment seen or measured intra-operatively during TKR is
not necessarily the same as the deformity seen on a standing long-leg
radiograph either pre- or post-operatively. Further investigation
into the effect of weight-bearing and surgical exposure of the joint
on the mechanical femorotibial angle is required to enable the most appropriate
intra-operative alignment to be selected.
Advances in the design of the components for total ankle replacement have led to a resurgence of interest in this procedure. Between January 1999 and December 2004, 16 patients with a failed total ankle replacement were referred to our unit. In the presence of infection, a two-stage salvage procedure was planned. The first involved the removal of the components and the insertion of a cement spacer. Definitive treatment options included hindfoot fusion with a circular frame or amputation. When there was no infection, a one-stage salvage procedure was planned. Options included hindfoot fusion with an intramedullary nail or revision total ankle replacement. When there was suspicion of infection, a percutaneous biopsy was performed. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Of the 16 patients, 14 had aseptic loosening, five of whom underwent a revision total ankle replacement and nine a hindfoot fusion. Of the two with infection, one underwent fusion and the other a below-knee amputation. There were no cases of wound breakdown, nonunion or malunion. Management of the failed total ankle replacement should be performed by experienced surgeons and ideally in units where multidisciplinary support is available. Currently, a hindfoot fusion appears to be preferable to a revision total ankle replacement.