Rotating-hinge knee prostheses are commonly used to reconstruct the distal femur after resection of a tumour, despite the projected long-term burden of reoperation due to complications. Few studies have examined the factors that influence their failure and none, to our knowledge, have used competing risk models to do so. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for failure of a rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using the Fine-Gray competing risk model. We retrospectively reviewed 209 consecutive patients who, between 1991 and 2016, had undergone resection of the distal femur for tumour and reconstruction using a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis. The study endpoint was failure of the prosthesis, defined as removal of the femoral component, the tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation; major revision (exchange of the femoral component, tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation); or amputation.Aims
Methods
In patients with a tumour affecting the distal
ulna it is difficult to preserve the function of the wrist following extensive
local resection. We report the outcome of 12 patients (nine female,
three male) who underwent excision of the distal ulna without local
soft-tissue reconstruction. In six patients, an aggressive benign
tumour was present and six had a malignant tumour. At a mean follow-up
of 64 months (15 to 132) the mean Musculoskeletal Tumour score was
64% (40% to 93%) and the mean DASH score was 35 (10 to 80). The
radiological appearances were satisfactory in most patients. Local
recurrence occurred in one patient with benign disease and two with
malignant disease. The functional outcome was thus satisfactory
at a mean follow-up in excess of five years, with a relatively low
rate of complications. The authors conclude that complex reconstructive
soft-tissue procedures may not be needed in these patients. Cite this article:
The current indications for functional restoration
of extension of the knee following quadriceps resection or loss require
reappraisal. The contribution of pedicled and free functional muscle
transfer is likely to be over-emphasised in many studies, with good
functional outcomes predominantly reported only in the context of
cases with residual quadriceps function. In cases with total quadriceps
resection or loss, all forms of reconstruction perform poorly. Furthermore,
in smaller resections with loss of two or fewer components of the
quadriceps, minimal impairment of function occurs in the absence
of functional reconstruction, suggesting that functional restoration
may not be warranted. Thus there is a paradox in the current approach
to quadriceps reconstruction, in that small resections are likely
to be over-treated and large resections remain under-treated. This review suggests a shift is required in the approach and
rationale for reconstructing functional extension of the knee after
quadriceps resection or loss. A classification based on current
evidence is suggested that emphasises more clearly the indications
and rationale for functional transfers.
We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients with an osteosarcoma who had undergone prior manipulative therapy, a popular treatment in Asia, and investigated its effects on several prognostic factors. Of the 134 patients in this study, 70 (52%) patients had manipulative therapy and 64 (48%) did not. The age, location, and size of tumour were not significantly different between the groups. The five-year overall survival rate was 58% and 92% in the groups with and without manipulative therapy (p = 0.004). Both the primary and overall rates of lung metastasis were significantly higher in the manipulative group (primary: 32% This form of therapy may serve as a mechanism to accelerate the spread of tumour cells, and therefore must be avoided in order to improve the outcome for patients with an osteosarcoma.