Aims. We hypothesised that the synovial white blood cell (WBC) count
in patients with a late periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of
the hip would depend on the duration of a patient’s symptoms, and
that the optimal diagnostic threshold would also depend on this
period of time. Patients and Methods. The synovial WBC count and percentage of polymorphonuclear cells
(%PMN), and the serum CRP and ESR levels obtained >
six weeks after
primary THA were compared between 50 infected and 88 non-infected
THAs, and in patients with symptoms for more than or less than two
weeks. Diagnostic thresholds for the synovial WBC count were calculated
using area under the curve calculation. Results. The synovial WBC count was significantly higher in patients with
symptoms for ≤ two weeks compared with those with symptoms for >
two weeks (p = 0.03). The optimal threshold for diagnosing PJI for
the synovial WBC count was 5750 cells/µL (sensitivity 94; specificity
100; PPV 100%; NPV 89%; AUC 99%) and 1556 cells/µL (sensitivity
91; specificity 94; PPV 87% and NPV 97%; AUC 95%), respectively.
The thresholds for the cut-offs based on
The purpose of this study was to evaluate unexpected positive cultures in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions for presumed aseptic loosening, to assess the prevalence of low-grade infection using two definition criteria, and to analyze its impact on implant survival after revision. A total of 274 THA revisions performed for presumed aseptic loosening from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed. In addition to obtaining intraoperative tissue cultures from all patients, synovial and sonication fluid samples of the removed implant were obtained in 215 cases (79%) and 101 cases (37%), respectively. Histopathological analysis was performed in 250 cases (91%). Patients were classified as having low-grade infections according to institutional criteria and Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2013 criteria. Low-grade infections according to institutional criteria were treated with targeted antibiotics for six weeks postoperatively. Implant failure was defined as the need for re-revision resulting from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic reasons. The mean follow-up was 68 months (26 to 95).Aims
Methods
This paper aims to review the evidence for patient-related factors associated with less favourable outcomes following hip arthroscopy. Literature reporting on preoperative patient-related risk factors and outcomes following hip arthroscopy were systematically identified from a computer-assisted literature search of Pubmed (Medline), Embase, and Cochrane Library using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a scoping review.Aims
Methods
Advocates of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR)
in hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) argue that a procedure
not disturbing a sound prosthesis-bone interface is likely to lead
to better survival and functional outcome compared with revision.
This case-control study aims were to compare outcome of DAIRs for
infected primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with outcomes following
primary THA and two-stage revision of infected primary THAs. We retrospectively reviewed all DAIRs, performed for confirmed
infected primary hip arthropasty (n = 82) at out institution, between
1997 and 2013. Data recorded included full patient information and
type of surgery. Outcome measures included complications, mortality,
implant survivorship and functional outcome. Outcome was compared with
two control groups matched for gender and age; a cohort of primary
THAs (n = 120) and a cohort of two-stage revisions for infection
(n = 66).Aims
Patients and Methods
