The aim of this study was to compare the longer-term outcomes of operatively and nonoperatively managed patients treated with a removable brace (fixed-angle removable orthosis) or a plaster cast immobilization for an acute ankle fracture. This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing adults with an acute ankle fracture, initially managed either by operative or nonoperative care. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a cast immobilization or a fixed-angle removable orthosis (removable brace). Data were collected on baseline characteristics, ankle function, quality of life, and complications. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) was the primary outcome which was used to measure the participant’s ankle function. The primary endpoint was at 16 weeks, with longer-term follow-up at 24 weeks and two years.Aims
Methods
To determine whether the findings from a landmark Canadian trial
assessing the optimal management of acute rupture of the Achilles
tendon influenced the practice patterns of orthopaedic surgeons
in Ontario, Canada. Health administrative databases were used to identify Ontario
residents ≥ 18 years of age with an Achilles tendon rupture from
April 2002 to March 2014. The rate of surgical repair (per 100 cases)
was calculated for each calendar quarter. A time-series analysis
was used to determine whether changes in the rate were chronologically
related to the dissemination of results from a landmark trial published
in February 2009. Non-linear spline regression was then used independently
to identify critical time-points of change in the surgical repair
rate to confirm the findings.Aims
Materials and Methods
