Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1368 - 1374
3 Oct 2020
McDonnell JM Ahern DP Lui DF Yu H Lehovsky J Noordeen H Molloy S Butler JS Gibson A

Aims. Whether a combined anteroposterior fusion or a posterior-only fusion is more effective in the management of patients with Scheuermanns kyphosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of these surgical approaches, and to evaluate the postoperative complications with the hypothesis that proximal junctional kyphosis would be more common in one-stage posterior-only fusion. Methods. A retrospective review of patients treated surgically for Scheuermanns kyphosis between 2006 and 2014 was performed. A total of 62 patients were identified, with 31 in each group. Parameters were compared to evaluate postoperative outcomes using chi-squared tests, independent-samples t-tests, and z-tests of proportions analyses where applicable. Results. There were six postoperative infections in the two-stage anteroposterior group compared with three in the one-stage posterior-only group. A total of four patients in the anteroposterior group required revision surgery, compared with six in the posterior-only group. There was a significantly higher incidence of junctional failure associated with the one-stage posterior-only approach (12.9% vs 0%, p = 0.036). Proximal junction kyphosis (anteroposterior fusion (74.2%) vs posterior-only fusion (77.4%); p = 0.382) and distal junctional kyphosis (anteroposterior fusion (25.8%) vs posterior-only fusion (19.3%), p = 0.271) are common postoperative complications following both surgical approaches. Conclusion. A two-stage anteroposterior fusion was associated with a significantly greater correction of the kyphosis compared with a one-stage posterior-only fusion, with a reduced incidence of junctional failure (0 vs 3). There was a notably greater incidence of infection with two-stage anteroposterior fusion; however, all were medically managed. More patients in the posterior-only group required revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1368–1374


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 1 | Pages 148 - 156
1 Jan 2021
Tsirikos AI Carter TH

Aims. To report the surgical outcome of patients with severe Scheuermanns kyphosis treated using a consistent technique and perioperative management. Methods. We reviewed 88 consecutive patients with a severe Scheuermann's kyphosis who had undergone posterior spinal fusion with closing wedge osteotomies and hybrid instrumentation. There were 55 males and 33 females with a mean age of 15.9 years (12.0 to 24.7) at the time of surgery. We recorded their demographics, spinopelvic parameters, surgical correction, and perioperative data, and assessed the impact of surgical complications on outcome using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire. Results. The mean follow-up was 8.4 years (2 to 14.9). There were 85 patients (96.6%) with a thoracic deformity. Posterior spinal fusion with closing-wedge osteotomies and hybrid instrumentation was used in 86 patients; two patients underwent combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion. The mean kyphosis was corrected from 94.5° to 47.5° (p < 0.001). Coronal and sagittal balance returned to normal. The rate of complications was 12.5%: there were no neurological deficits, implant failure, or revision surgery. SRS-22 scores improved from a mean 3.6 (1.3 to 4.1) to 4.6 (4.2 to 5.0) at two years (p < 0.001) with a high rate of patient satisfaction. Non-smokers and patients with lower preoperative SRS-22 scores showed greater improvement in their quality of life. Sagittal pelvic balance did not change after correction of the kyphosis and correlated with lumbar lordosis but not with thoracic or thoracolumbar kyphosis. Conclusion. Posterior spinal fusion using hybrid instrumentation, closing-wedge osteotomies, and iliac bone grafting achieves satisfactory correction of a severe kyphosis resulting in improvements in physical and mental health and a high degree of patient-reported satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):148–156


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 7 | Pages 857 - 864
1 Jul 2011
Tsirikos AI Jain AK

This review of the literature presents the current understanding of Scheuermanns kyphosis and investigates the controversies concerning conservative and surgical treatment. There is considerable debate regarding the pathogenesis, natural history and treatment of this condition. A benign prognosis with settling of symptoms and stabilisation of the deformity at skeletal maturity is expected in most patients. Observation and programmes of exercise are appropriate for mild, flexible, non-progressive deformities. Bracing is indicated for a moderate deformity which spans several levels and retains flexibility in motivated patients who have significant remaining spinal growth. The loss of some correction after the completion of bracing with recurrent anterior vertebral wedging has been reported in approximately one-third of patients. Surgical correction with instrumented spinal fusion is indicated for a severe kyphosis which carries a risk of progression beyond the end of growth causing cosmetic deformity, back pain and neurological complications. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of different techniques and types of instrumentation. Techniques include posterior-only and combined anteroposterior spinal fusion with or without posterior osteotomies across the apex of the deformity. Current instrumented techniques include hybrid and all-pedicle screw constructs


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 68-B, Issue 2 | Pages 189 - 193
1 Mar 1986
Speck G Chopin D

The results of surgery in 59 patients with Scheuermann's kyphosis are reported at an average follow-up of 56 months. These show that in skeletally immature patients, in whom the iliac apophysis has not yet fused to the body of the ilium, posterior fusion alone is adequate and is followed by little loss of correction. For skeletally mature patients combined anterior and posterior surgery is recommended. In all cases a period of pre-operative treatment is important. It is stressed that the indications for surgery are limited


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 77-B, Issue 6 | Pages 943 - 950
1 Nov 1995
Ferreira-Alves A Resina J Palma-Rodrigues R

Between 1969 and 1989, we performed posterior segmental instrumentation on 38 patients with thoracic Scheuermann's kyphosis. We used a dynamic system without sublaminar fixation, and a kyphosis of 50 degrees was the main indication for surgery. The mean initial angle was 68 degrees (50 to 100) and the mean final kyphosis was 43 degrees at five-year follow-up, with a mean final loss after surgery of 3.7 degrees. Reconstruction of the vertebral bodies, vertebral wedging and the anterior-body height ratio were observed even in skeletally mature patients. There were no medical complications. There were three cases of loss of correction by more than 10 degrees and one of rod fracture with pseudarthrosis. The role of non-operative treatment is evaluated and early surgical treatment is advocated


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 67-B, Issue 2 | Pages 189 - 192
1 Mar 1985
Deacon P Berkin C Dickson R

A radiological study of 50 patients with thoracic Scheuermann's disease revealed two types of lateral spinal curvature. A total of 43 lateral curves was present in 35 of the patients. Thirteen were apical at the same level as the Scheuermann's kyphosis and were due to vertebral-body wedging in the coronal plane; these curves had a mean Cobb angle of 15 degrees, occurred with equal prevalence in boys and girls and were directed equally to right and left. Thirty curves occurred in regions of compensatory lordosis (mean 5.6 degrees) situated above or, more commonly, below the Scheuermann's kyphosis. These scolioses had a mean Cobb angle of 16 degrees, were more often convex to the right than to the left and were significantly more prevalent in girls than in boys. The presence of these kyphoses and scolioses in the same spine, separated by only a few vertebrae, emphasises the importance of the sagittal plane in idiopathic spinal deformities and strongly suggests that idiopathic scoliosis and Scheuermann's disease share a common pathological process


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 4 | Pages 804 - 804
1 Apr 2021
Tsirikos AI Carter TH


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 4 | Pages 415 - 424
1 Apr 2018
Tambe AD Panikkar SJ Millner PA Tsirikos AI

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a complex 3D deformity of the spine. Its prevalence is between 2% and 3% in the general population, with almost 10% of patients requiring some form of treatment and up to 0.1% undergoing surgery. The cosmetic aspect of the deformity is the biggest concern to the patient and is often accompanied by psychosocial distress. In addition, severe curves can cause cardiopulmonary distress. With proven benefits from surgery, the aims of treatment are to improve the cosmetic and functional outcomes. Obtaining correction in the coronal plane is not the only important endpoint anymore. With better understanding of spinal biomechanics and the long-term effects of multiplanar imbalance, we now know that sagittal balance is equally, if not more, important. Better correction of deformities has also been facilitated by an improvement in the design of implants and a better understanding of metallurgy. Understanding the unique character of each deformity is important. In addition, using the most appropriate implant and applying all the principles of correction in a bespoke manner is important to achieve optimum correction.

In this article, we review the current concepts in AIS surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:415–24.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 6 | Pages 751 - 759
1 Jun 2010
Tsirikos AI Garrido EG

A review of the current literature shows that there is a lack of consensus regarding the treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Most of the views and recommendations provided in various reports are weakly supported by evidence. There is a limited amount of information about the natural history of the condition, making it difficult to compare the effectiveness of various conservative and operative treatments. This systematic review summarises the current knowledge on spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis and attempts to present a rational approach to the evaluation and management of this condition in children and adolescents.