Surgical treatment of hip fracture is challenging; the bone is porotic and fixation failure can be catastrophic. Novel implants are available which may yield superior clinical outcomes. This study compared the clinical effectiveness of the novel X-Bolt Hip System (XHS) with the sliding hip screw (SHS) for the treatment of fragility hip fractures. We conducted a multicentre, superiority, randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 60 years and older with a trochanteric hip fracture were recruited in ten acute UK NHS hospitals. Participants were randomly allocated to fixation of their fracture with XHS or SHS. A total of 1,128 participants were randomized with 564 participants allocated to each group. Participants and outcome assessors were blind to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the EuroQol five-dimension five-level health status (EQ-5D-5L) utility at four months. The minimum clinically important difference in utility was pre-specified at 0.075. Secondary outcomes were EQ-5D-5L utility at 12 months, mortality, residential status, mobility, revision surgery, and radiological measures.Aims
Methods
The long-term functional outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA)
performed by trainees is not known. A multicentre retrospective
study of 879 THAs was undertaken to investigate any differences
in outcome between those performed by trainee surgeons and consultants. A total of 879 patients with a mean age of 69.5 years (37 to
94) were included in the study; 584 THAs (66.4%) were undertaken
by consultants, 138 (15.7%) by junior trainees and 148 (16.8%) by
senior trainees. Patients were scored using the Harris Hip Score
(HHS) pre-operatively and at one, three, five, seven and ten years
post-operatively. Surgical outcome, complications and survival were
compared between groups. The effect of supervision was determined
by comparing supervised and unsupervised trainees. A primary univariate
analysis was used to select variables for inclusion in multivariate
analysis. Aims
Patients and Methods
