Restoration of leg length and offset is an important
goal in total hip replacement. This paper reports a calliper-based technique
to help achieve these goals by restoring the location of the centre
of the femoral head. This was validated first by using a co-ordinate
measuring machine to see how closely the calliper technique could
record and restore the centre of the femoral head when simulating
hip replacement on Sawbone femur, and secondly by using CT in patients
undergoing hip replacement. Results from the co-ordinate measuring machine showed that the
centre of the femoral head was predicted by the calliper to within
4.3 mm for offset (mean 1.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to
2.8)) and 2.4 mm for vertical height (mean -0.6 (95% CI -1.4 to
0.2)).
The CT scans showed that offset and vertical height were restored
to within 8 mm
(mean -1 (95% CI -2.1 to 0.6)) and -14 mm (mean 4 (95% CI 1.8 to
4.3)), respectively. Accurate assessment and restoration of the centre of the femoral
head is feasible with a calliper. It is quick, inexpensive, simple
to use and can be applied to any design of femoral component.
Aims. Surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA), compared with traditional total hip arthroplasty (THA), is more expensive and carries unique concern related to metal ions production and hypersensitivity. Additionally, SRA is a more demanding procedure with a decreased margin for error compared with THA. To justify its use, SRA must demonstrate comparable component survival and some clinical advantages. We therefore performed a systematic literature review to investigate the differences in complication rates, patient-reported outcomes, stress shielding, and hip biomechanics between SRA and THA. Materials and Methods. A systematic review of the literature was completed using MEDLINE and EMBASE search engines. Inclusion criteria were level I to level III articles that reported clinical outcomes following primary SRA compared with THA. An initial search yielded 2503 potential articles for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included review articles, level IV or level V evidence, less than one year’s follow-up, and previously reported data. In total, 27 articles with 4182 patients were available to analyze. Results. Fracture and infection rates were similar between SRA and THA, while dislocation rates were lower in SRA compared with THA. SRA demonstrated equivalent patient-reported outcome scores with greater activity scores and a return to high-level activities compared with THA. SRA more reliably restored native hip joint biomechanics and decreased stress shielding of the proximal femur compared with THA. Conclusion. In young active men with osteoarthritis, there is evidence that SRA offers some potential advantages over THA, including: improved return to high level activities and sport,
Polished taper-slip (PTS) cemented stems have an excellent clinical track record and are the most common stem type used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the UK. Due to low rates of aseptic loosening, they have largely replaced more traditional composite beam (CB) cemented stems. However, there is now emerging evidence from multiple joint registries that PTS stems are associated with higher rates of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) compared to their CB stem counterparts. The risk of both intraoperative and postoperative PFF remains greater with uncemented stems compared to either of these cemented stem subtypes. PFF continues to be a devastating complication following primary THA and is associated with high complication and mortality rates. Recent efforts have focused on identifying implant-related risk factors for PFF in order to guide preventative strategies, and therefore the purpose of this article is to present the current evidence on the effect of cemented femoral stem design on the risk of PFF. Cite this article:
Achieving accurate implant positioning and restoring native hip biomechanics are key surgeon-controlled technical objectives in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary objective of this study was to compare the reproducibility of the planned preoperative centre of hip rotation (COR) in patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted THA versus conventional THA. This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 60 patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis undergoing conventional THA (CO THA) versus robotic arm-assisted THA (RO THA). Patients in both arms underwent pre- and postoperative CT scans, and a patient-specific plan was created using the robotic software. The COR, combined offset, acetabular orientation, and leg length discrepancy were measured on the pre- and postoperative CT scanogram at six weeks following surgery.Aims
Methods
The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) arthroplasty has been used as a surgical treatment of coxarthrosis since 1997. We present 20-year results of 234 consecutive BHRs performed in our unit. Between 1999 and 2001, there were 217 patients: 142 males (65.4%), mean age 52 years (18 to 68) who had 234 implants (17 bilateral). They had patient-reported outcome measures collected, imaging (radiograph and ultrasound), and serum metal ion assessment. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Revision for any cause was considered as an endpoint for the analysis.Aims
Methods
Perthes’ disease (PD) often results in femoral head deformity and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Our objective was to analyze femoral morphology in PD patients at skeletal maturity to assess where the LLD originates, and evaluate the effect of contralateral epiphysiodesis for length equalization on proximal and subtrochanteric femoral lengths. All patients treated for PD in our institution between January 2013 and June 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with unilateral PD, LLD of ≥ 5 mm, and long-leg standing radiographs at skeletal maturity were included. Total leg length, femoral and tibial length, articulotrochanteric distance (ATD), and subtrochanteric femoral length were compared between PD side and the unaffected side. Furthermore, we compared leg length measurements between patients who did and who did not have a contralateral epiphysiodesis.Aims
Methods
The primary objective of this study was to compare accuracy in restoring the native centre of hip rotation in patients undergoing conventional manual total hip arthroplasty (THA) This prospective cohort study included 50 patients undergoing conventional manual THA and 25 patients receiving robotic-arm assisted THA. Patients undergoing conventional manual THA and robotic-arm assisted THA were well matched for age (mean age, 69.4 years (Objectives
Materials and Methods
The primary purpose of this study of metal-on-metal
(MoM) hip resurfacing was to compare the effect of using a cementless
or cemented femoral component on the subsequent bone mineral density
(BMD) of the femoral neck. This was a single-centre, prospective, double-blinded control
trial which randomised 120 patients (105 men and 15 women) with
a mean age of 49.4 years (21 to 68) to receive either a cemented
or cementless femoral component. Follow-up was to two years. Outcome
measures included total and six-point region-of-interest BMD of
the femoral neck, radiological measurements of acetabular inclination,
neck-shaft and stem-shaft angles, and functional outcome scores
including the Harris hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster
Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the University of California
at Los Angeles activity scale. In total, 17 patients were lost to follow-up leaving 103 patients
at two years. There were no revisions in the cementless group and
three revisions (5%) in the cemented group (two because of hip pain
and one for pseudotumour). The total BMD was significantly higher in the cementless group
at six months (p <
0.001) and one year (p = 0.01) than in the
cemented group, although there was a loss of statistical significance
in the difference at two years (p = 0.155). All patient outcomes improved significantly: there were no significant
differences between the two groups. The results show better preservation of femoral neck BMD with
a cementless femoral component after two years of follow-up. Further
investigation is needed to establish whether this translates into
improved survivorship. Cite this article:
Given the increasing number of total hip arthroplasty
procedures being performed annually, it is imperative that orthopaedic
surgeons understand factors responsible for instability. In order
to treat this potentially complex problem, we recommend correctly
classifying the type of instability present based on component position, abductor
function, impingement, and polyethylene wear. Correct classification
allows the treating surgeon to choose the appropriate revision option
that ultimately will allow for the best potential outcome. Cite this article:
We present the results of 62 consecutive acetabular
revisions using impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene
acetabular component in 58 patients (13 men and 45 women) after
a mean follow-up of 27 years (25 to 30). All patients were prospectively
followed. The mean age at revision was 59.2 years (23 to 82). We performed Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis and also a Competing
Risk (CR) analysis because with long-term follow-up, the presence
of a competing event (i.e. death) prevents the occurrence of the
endpoint of re-revision. A total of 48 patients (52 hips) had died or had been re-revised
at final review in March 2011. None of the deaths were related to
the surgery. The mean Harris hip score of the ten surviving hips
in ten patients was 76 points (45 to 99). The KM survivorship at 25 years for the endpoint ‘re-revision
for any reason’ was 58.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38 to 73)
and for ‘re-revision for aseptic loosening’ 72.1% (95% CI 51 to
85). With the CR analysis we calculated the KM analysis overestimates
the failure rate with respectively 74% and 93% for these endpoints.
The current study shows that acetabular impaction bone grafting
revisions provide good clinical results at over 25 years. Cite this article:
