We used prospective data from 862 total knee and 716 total hip replacements three years after surgery in order to derive and validate a reduced Western Ontario and McMasters University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function scale. The reduced scale was derived using the advice of clinical experts as well as analysis of data. The scale was tested for validity, reliability and responsiveness. Items which were retained included: ascending stairs, rising from sitting, walking on the flat, getting in or out of a car, putting on socks, rising from bed, and sitting. The reduced and full scales had comparable, moderate correlations with other measures of function, confirming convergent validity. Cronbach’s alpha was high (α >
0.85) with the reduced scale confirming reliability.
To validate the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12)
as a tool to evaluate the outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in
a United Kingdom population. All patients undergoing surgery between January and August 2014
were eligible for inclusion. Prospective data were collected from
205 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 231 patients
undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Outcomes were assessed
with the FJS-12 and the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS, OKS) pre-operatively,
then at six and 12 months post-operatively. Internal consistency,
convergent validity, effect size, relative validity and ceiling
effects were determined.Aims
Patients and Methods
Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
(WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment
of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients
undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).
We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective
of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n =
494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these
patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three,
six, 12 and 24 months’ follow-up, they were asked to nominate an
item of the function scale that was most important to them. The
items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing
THR and those undergoing TKR (p <
0.001), and there was a shift
in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold
for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items
were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were
common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR
function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared
with the original WOMAC function form. Cite this article:
