Repeated lumbar spine surgery has been associated with inferior clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine and quantify the impact of this association in a national clinical register cohort. This is a population-based study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine surgery (NORspine). We included 26,723 consecutive cases operated for lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar disc herniation from January 2007 to December 2018. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), presented as the proportions reaching a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS; defined as an ODI raw score ≤ 22) and ODI raw and change scores at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the Global Perceived Effect scale, the numerical rating scale for pain, the EuroQoL five-dimensions health questionnaire, occurrence of perioperative complications and wound infections, and working capability. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine how the number of previous operations influenced the odds of not reaching a PASS.Aims
Methods
Lumbar disc prolapse is a frequent indication for surgery. The few available long-term follow-up studies focus mainly on repeated surgery for recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to analyze all reasons for additional surgery for patients operated on for a primary lumbar disc prolapse. We retrieved data from the Swedish spine register about 3,291 patients who underwent primary surgery for a lumbar disc prolapse between January 2007 and December 2008. These patients were followed until December 2020 to record all additional lumbar spine operations and the reason for them.Aims
Methods
Whether to combine spinal decompression with
fusion in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis remains
controversial. We performed a cohort study to determine the effect
of the addition of fusion in terms of patient satisfaction after
decompressive spinal surgery in patients with and without a degenerative spondylolisthesis. The National Swedish Register for Spine Surgery (Swespine) was
used for the study. Data were obtained for all patients in the register
who underwent surgery for stenosis on one or two adjacent lumbar
levels. A total of 5390 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria
and completed a two-year follow-up. Using multivariable models the
results of 4259 patients who underwent decompression alone were
compared with those of 1131 who underwent decompression and fusion.
The consequence of having an associated spondylolisthesis in the
operated segments pre-operatively was also considered. At two years there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction
between the two treatment groups for any of the outcome measures,
regardless of the presence of a pre-operative spondylolisthesis.
Moreover, the proportion of patients who required subsequent further
lumbar surgery was also similar in the two groups. In this large cohort the addition of fusion to decompression
was not associated with an improved outcome. Cite this article:
