The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs). We undertook a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients who had undergone fusion for an EOS, which had been previously treated using either TGRs or MCGRs. Measured outcomes included sequential coronal T1 to S1 height and major curve (Cobb) angle on plain radiographs and any complications requiring unplanned surgery before final fusion.Aims
Methods
We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences. The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study was a multicentre randomized controlled trial with recruitment from September 2006 to February 2012. A total of 247 patients with one- or two-level central lumbar spinal stenosis, stratified by the presence of DS, were randomized to decompression alone or decompression with fusion. The five-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), visual analogue scales for back and leg pain, and patient-reported satisfaction, decreased pain, and increased walking distance. The reoperation rate was recorded.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion. The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study (SSSS) was conducted between 2006 and 2012 at five public and two private hospitals. Six centres participated in this two-year MRI follow-up. We randomized 222 patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two adjacent levels into two groups, decompression alone and decompression with fusion. The presence or absence of a preoperative spondylolisthesis was noted. A new stenosis on two-year MRI was used as the primary outcome, defined as a dural sac cross-sectional area ≤ 75 mm2 at the operated level (restenosis) and/or at the level above (proximal adjacent level stenosis).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of surgery
using growing rods in patients with severe A review of a multicentre EOS database identified 107 children
with severe EOS (major curve ≥ 90°) treated with growing rods before
the age of ten years with a minimum follow-up of two years and three
or more lengthening procedures. From the same database, 107 matched
controls with moderate EOS were identified.Aims
Patients and Methods
In a multicentre, randomised study of adolescents undergoing
posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis, we investigated
the effect of adding gelatine matrix with human thrombin to the
standard surgical methods of controlling blood loss. Patients in the intervention group (n = 30) were randomised to
receive a minimum of two and a maximum of four units of gelatine
matrix with thrombin in addition to conventional surgical methods
of achieving haemostasis. Only conventional surgical methods were
used in the control group (n = 30). We measured the intra-operative
and total blood loss (intra-operative blood loss plus post-operative
drain output).Aims
Patients and Methods
In this study of patients who underwent internal fixation without
fusion for a burst thoracolumbar or lumbar fracture, we compared
the serial changes in the injured disc height (DH), and the fractured
vertebral body height (VBH) and kyphotic angle between patients
in whom the implants were removed and those in whom they were not. Radiological
parameters such as injured DH, fractured VBH and kyphotic angle
were measured. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Greenough
low back outcome scale and a VAS scale for pain. Between June 1996 and May 2012, 69 patients were analysed retrospectively;
47 were included in the implant removal group and 22 in the implant
retention group. After a mean follow-up of 66 months (48 to 107),
eight patients (36.3%) in the implant retention group had screw
breakage. There was no screw breakage in the implant removal group.
All radiological and functional outcomes were similar between these
two groups. Although solid union of the fractured vertebrae was
achieved, the kyphotic angle and the anterior third of the injured
DH changed significantly with time (p <
0.05). Methods
Results
Clinical, radiological, and Scoliosis Research
Society-22 questionnaire data were reviewed pre-operatively and
two years post-operatively for patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior spinal fusion
using a unilateral convex segmental pedicle screw technique. A total
of 72 patients were included (67 female, 5 male; mean age at surgery
16.7 years (13 to 23)) and divided into groups: group 1 included
53 patients who underwent fusion between the vertebrae at the limit
of the curve (proximal and distal end vertebrae); group 2 included
19 patients who underwent extension of the fusion distally beyond
the caudal end vertebra. A mean scoliosis correction of 80% (45% to 100%) was achieved.
The mean post-operative lowest instrumented vertebra angle, apical
vertebra translation and trunk shift were less than in previous
studies. A total of five pre-operative radiological parameters differed
significantly between the groups and correlated with the extension
of the fusion distally: the size of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve,
the lowest instrumented vertebra angle, apical vertebra translation,
the Cobb angle on lumbar convex bending and the size of the compensatory
thoracic curve. Regression analysis allowed an equation incorporating
these parameters to be developed which had a positive predictive
value of 81% in determining whether the lowest instrumented vertebra
should be at the caudal end vertebra or one or two levels more distal.
There were no differences in the Scoliosis Research Society-22 outcome
scores between the two groups (p = 0.17). In conclusion, thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in patients with adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis may be effectively treated by posterior spinal
fusion using a unilateral segmental pedicle screw technique. Five
radiological parameters correlate with the need for distal extension
of the fusion, and an equation incorporating these parameters reliably
informs selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra. Cite this article:
This prospective multicentre study was undertaken
to determine segmental movement, disc height and sagittal alignment
after total disc replacement (TDR) in the lumbosacral spine and
to assess the correlation of biomechanical properties to clinical
outcomes. A total of 173 patients with degenerative disc disease and low
back pain for more than one year were randomised to receive either
TDR or multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR). Segmental movement
in the sagittal plane and disc height were measured using distortion
compensated roentgen analysis (DCRA) comparing radiographs in active flexion
and extension. Correlation analysis between the range of movement
or disc height and patient-reported outcomes was performed in both
groups. After two years, no significant change in movement in the
sagittal plane was found in segments with TDR or between the two
treatment groups. It remained the same or increased slightly in
untreated segments in the TDR group and in this group there was
a significant increase in disc height in the operated segments.
There was no correlation between segmental movement or disc height
and patient-reported outcomes in either group. In this study, insertion of an intervertebral disc prosthesis
TDR did not increase movement in the sagittal plane and segmental
movement did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. This
suggests that in the lumbar spine the movement preserving properties
of TDR are not major determinants of clinical outcomes. Cite this article:
