Aims. The primary aim of the study was to perform an analysis to identify the cost per
The aim was to assess whether robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had greater knee-specific outcomes, improved fulfilment of expectations, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared with manual TKA (mTKA). A randomized controlled trial was undertaken (May 2019 to December 2021), and patients were allocated to either mTKA or rTKA. A total of 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 43 rTKA and 38 mTKA patients were available for review at 12 months following surgery. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the groups. The minimal clinically important difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score was defined as 7.5 points.Aims
Methods
The aim is to assess the cost-effectiveness of patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in comparison with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) based on prospectively collected data on health outcomes and resource use from a blinded, randomized, clinical trial. A total of 100 patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either PFA or TKA by experienced knee surgeons trained in using both implants. Patients completed patient-reported outcomes including EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and 6-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-6D) before the procedure. The scores were completed again after six weeks, three, six, and nine months, and again after one- and two-year post-surgery and yearly henceforth. Time-weighted outcome measures were constructed. Cost data were obtained from clinical registrations and patient-reported questionnaires. Incremental gain in health outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)) and incremental costs were compared for the two groups of patients. Net monetary benefit was calculated assuming a threshold value of €10,000, €35,000, and €50,000 per QALY and used to test the statistical uncertainty and central assumptions about outcomes and costs.Aims
Methods
Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) has experienced significant
improvements in implant survivorship with second generation designs.
This has renewed interest in PFA as an alternative to total knee
arthroplasty (TKA) for younger active patients with isolated patellofemoral
osteoarthritis (PF OA). We analysed the cost-effectiveness of PFA We used a Markov transition state model to compare cost-effectiveness
between PFA and TKA. Simulated patients were aged 60 (base case)
and 50 years. Lifetime costs (2015 United States dollars), quality-adjusted
life year (QALY) gains and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
(ICER) were calculated from a healthcare payer perspective. Annual rates
of revision were derived from the National Joint Registry for England,
Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Deterministic and probabilistic
sensitivity analysis was performed for all parameters against a
$50 000/QALY willingness to pay. Aims
Patients and Methods
