Aims. Hip hemiarthroplasty is a standard treatment for intracapsular
proximal femoral fractures in the frail elderly. In this study we
have explored the implications of early return to theatre, within
30 days, on patient outcome following hip hemiarthroplasty. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of all hip hemiarthroplasties
performed in our unit between January 2010 and January 2015. Demographic
details, medical backround, details of the primary procedure, complications,
subsequent procedures requiring return to theatre, re-admissions,
discharge destination and death were collected. Results. A total of 705 procedures were included; 428 Austin Moore and
277 Exeter Trauma Stems were used. A total of 34 fractures (in 33
patients) required early return to theatre within 30 days. Age,
gender, laterality, time from admission to primary procedure, American
Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and implant type were similar
for those requiring early return to theatre and those who did not.
Early return to theatre was associated with a significantly higher
length of stay (mean 33.6 days (7 to 107) versus 18.6
days (0 to 152), p <
0.001), re-admission rate (38.2% versus 8.6%,
p <
0.001), and subsequent revision rate (17.6% versus 1.3%,
p <
0.001). We found no difference in level of care required
on discharge or mortality. Conclusion. Proximal femoral fractures are common in the elderly population,
with far-reaching medical and economic implications. Factors such
as infection or dislocation may require early return to theatre,
and this is associated with outcomes which may be both medically
and economically detrimental. This illustrates the importance of
avoiding early complications to improve longer term outcome. Return to theatre within 30 days is associated with longer length
of stay, higher re-admission rate, and higher subsequent revision
rate. It may be a useful short-term
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of hospital-level service characteristics on hip fracture outcomes and quality of care processes measures. This was a retrospective analysis of publicly available audit data obtained from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) 2018 benchmark summary and Facilities Survey. Data extraction was performed using a dedicated proforma to identify relevant hospital-level care process and outcome variables for inclusion. The primary outcome measure was adjusted 30-day mortality rate. A random forest-based multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) algorithm was used for missing value imputation. Univariable analysis for each hospital level factor was performed using a combination of Tobit regression, Siegal non-parametric linear regression, and Mann-Whitney U test analyses, dependent on the data type. In all analyses, a p-value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.Aims
Methods
In this study, we aimed to determine whether designation as a
major trauma centre (MTC) affects the quality of care for patients
with a fracture of the hip. All patients in the United Kingdom National Hip Fracture Database,
between April 2010 and December 2013, were included. The indicators
of quality that were recorded included the time to arrival on an
orthopaedic ward, to review by a geriatrician, and to operation.
The clinical outcomes were the development of a pressure sore, discharge
home, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and re-operation within
30 days. Aims
Patients and Methods
We aimed to determine whether there is evidence of improved patient
outcomes in Major Trauma Centres following the regionalisation of
trauma care in England. An observational study was undertaken using the Trauma Audit
and Research Network (TARN), Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and
national death registrations. The outcome measures were indicators
of the quality of trauma care, such as treatment by a senior doctor
and clinical outcomes, such as mortality in hospital.Aims
Patients and Methods
