Patients from a randomised trial on resurfacing
hip arthroplasty (RHA) (n = 36, 19 males; median age 57 years, 24
to 65) comparing a conventional 28 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty
(MoM THA) (n = 28, 17 males; median age 59 years, 37 to 65) and
a matched control group of asymptomatic patients with a 32 mm ceramic-on-polyethylene
(CoP) THA (n = 33, 18 males; median age 63 years, 38 to 71) were
cross-sectionally screened with metal artefact reducing sequence-MRI
(MARS-MRI) for pseudotumour formation at a median of 55 months (23
to 72) post-operatively. MRIs were scored by consensus according
to three different classification systems for pseudotumour formation. Clinical scores were available for all patients and metal ion
levels for MoM bearing patients. Periprosthetic lesions with a median volume of 16 mL (1.5 to
35.9) were diagnosed in six patients in the RHA group (17%), one
in the MoM THA group (4%) and six in the CoP group (18%). The classification
systems revealed no clear differences between the groups. Solid
lesions (n = 3) were exclusively encountered in the RHA group. Two patients
in the RHA group and one in the MoM THA group underwent a revision
for pseudotumour formation. There was no statistically significant
relationship between clinical scoring, metal ion levels and periprosthetic
lesions in any of the groups. Periprosthetic fluid collections are seen on MARS-MRI after conventional
CoP THA and RHA and may reflect a soft-tissue collection or effusion. Currently available MRI classification systems seem to score
these collections as pseudotumours, causing an-overestimatation
of the incidence of pseudotumours. Cite this article:
Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip (MoMHR)
has enjoyed a resurgence in the last decade, but is now again in question
as a routine option for osteoarthritis of the hip. Proponents of
hip resurfacing suggest that its survival is superior to that of
conventional hip replacement (THR), and that hip resurfacing is
less invasive, is easier to revise than THR, and provides superior
functional outcomes. Our argument serves to illustrate that none
of these proposed advantages have been realised and new and unanticipated
serious complications, such as
Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty gained significant
favor in the first decade of the millennium. However, the past several
years have seen increasing reports of failure,
The purpose of this study was to compare two different types
of metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing for total hip arthroplasty (THA):
one with a large femoral head (38 mm to 52 mm) and the other with
a conventional femoral head (28 mm or 32 mm). We compared clinical
outcome, blood metal ion levels, and the incidence of pseudotumour in
the two groups. Between December 2009 and December 2011, 62 patients underwent
MoM THA with a large femoral head (Magnum group) and 57 patients
an MoM THA with a conventional femoral head (conventional group).
Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip score, University
of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score and EuroQol-5D
(EQ-5D). Blood metal ion levels were measured and MRI scans were
analyzed at a minimum of five years postoperatively.Aims
Patients and Methods
The differential diagnosis of the painful total
hip arthroplasty (resurfacing or total hip) includes infection,
failure of fixation (loosening), tendinitis, bursitis, synovitis,
adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) to cobalt-chromium alloys,
and non-hip issues, such as spinal disorders, hernia, gynecologic,
and other pelvic pain. Assuming that the hip is the source of pain,
the first level question is prosthetic or non-prosthetic pain generator?
The second level prosthetic question is septic or aseptic? The third
level question (aseptic hips) is well-fixed or loose? ALTR is best
diagnosed by cross-sectional imaging. Successful treatment is dependent
on correct identification and elimination of the pain generator.
Treatment recommendations for ALTR and taper corrosion are evolving.
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is an alternative to conventional
total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteonecrosis (ON) of the
femoral head. Our aim was to report the long-term outcome of HRA,
which is not currently known. Long-term survivorship, clinical scores and radiographic results
for 82 patients (99 hips) treated with HRA for ON over a period
of 18 years were reviewed retrospectively. The mean age of the 67
men and 15 women at the time of surgery was 40.8 years (14 to 64).
Patients were resurfaced regardless of the size of the osteonecrotic
lesion.Aims
Patients and Methods
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is commonly
associated with early hip arthritis. We reviewed our series of 1300
hip resurfacing procedures. More than 90% of our male patients,
with an average age of 53 years, had cam impingement lesions. In
this condition, there are anterior femoral neck osteophytes, and
a retroverted femoral head on a normally anteverted neck. It is
postulated that FAI results in collision of the anterior neck of
the femur against the rim of the acetabulum, causing damage to the
acetabular labrum and articular cartilage, resulting in osteoarthritis.
Early treatment of FAI involves arthroscopic or open removal of
bone from the anterior femoral neck, as well as repair or removal
of labral tears. However, once osteoarthritis has developed, hip
replacement or hip resurfacing is indicated. Hip resurfacing can
re-orient the head and re-shape the neck. This helps to restore
normal biomechanics to the hip, eliminate FAI, and improve range
of motion. Since many younger men with hip arthritis have FAI, and
are also considered the best candidates for hip resurfacing, it
is evident that resurfacing has a role in these patients.
A moderator and panel of five experts led an
interactive session in discussing five challenging and interesting patient
case presentations involving surgery of the hip. The hip pathologies
reviewed included failed open reduction internal fixation of subcapital
femoral neck fracture, bilateral hip disease, evaluation of pain
after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty, avascular necrosis, aseptic
loosening secondary to osteolysis and polyethylene wear, and management
of ceramic femoral head fracture.
We systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature to relate the survival of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty devices to a National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) benchmark for choosing a primary total hip replacement, which is a survival rate of 90% at a follow-up of ten years. A total of 29 articles (10 621 resurfaced hips) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up ranged from 0.6 to 10.5 years and the survival of the implant ranged from 84% to 100%. Of the 10 621 hips, 370 were revised (3.5%), with aseptic loosening as the most frequent mode of failure. None of the hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants used to date met the full ten-year NICE benchmark of survival. A total of 13 studies showed satisfactory survival compared with the three-year NICE benchmark.
