Open discectomy (OD) is the standard operation for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), however, has shown similar outcomes to OD and there is increasing interest in this procedure. However despite improved surgical techniques and instrumentation, reoperation and infection rates continue and are reported to be between 6% and 24% and 0.7% and 16%, respectively. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of reoperation and infection within six months of patients being treated for LDH either by OD or PELD. In this retrospective, nationwide cohort study, the Korean National Health Insurance database from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2018 was reviewed. Data were extracted for patients who underwent OD or PELD for LDH without a history of having undergone either procedure during the preceding year. Individual patients were followed for six months through their encrypted unique resident registration number. The primary endpoints were rates of reoperation and infection during the follow-up period. Other risk factors for reoperation and infection were also evalulated.Aims
Methods
Aims. Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) systems use non-invasive
spinal lengthening for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis
(EOS). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance
of these devices in the prevention of progression of the deformity.
A secondary aim was to record the rate of complications. Patients and Methods. An observational study of 31 consecutive children with EOS, of
whom 15 were male, who were treated between December 2011 and October
2017 was undertaken. Their mean age was 7.7 years (2 to 14). The
mean follow-up was 47 months (24 to 69). Distractions were completed
using the tailgating technique. The primary outcome measure was
correction of the radiographic deformity. Secondary outcomes were
growth, functional outcomes and complication rates. Results. The mean Cobb angle was 54° (14° to 91°) preoperatively and 37°
(11° to 69°) at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean thoracic
kyphosis (TK) was 45° (10° to 89°) preoperatively and 42° (9° to
84°) at the latest follow-up. The mean T1–S1 height increased from
287 mm (209 to 378) to 338 mm (240 to 427) (p < 0.001) and the
mean sagittal balance reduced from 68 mm (-76 to 1470) preoperatively
to 18 mm (-32 to 166) at the latest follow-up. The mean coronal balance
was 3 mm (-336 to 64) preoperatively and 8 mm (-144 to 64) at the
latest follow-up. The mean increase in weight and sitting and standing
height at the latest follow-up was 45%, 10% and 15%, respectively.
The mean Activity Scale for Kids (ASKp) scores increased in all
domains, with only personal care and standing skills being significant
at the latest follow-up (p = 0.02, p = 0.03). The improvements in
Cobb angle, TK and T1-S1 heights were not related to gender, the
aetiology of the EOS, or whether the
We present a case series of five patients who had revision surgery
following magnetic controlled growing rods (MGCR) for early onset
scoliosis. Metallosis was found during revision in four out of five
patients and we postulated a mechanism for rod failure based on
retrieval analysis. Retrieval analysis was performed on the seven explanted rods.
The mean duration of MCGR from implantation to revision was 35 months
(17 to 46). The mean age at revision was 12 years (7 to 15; four
boys, one girl).Aims
Patients and Methods
We undertook a prospective non-randomised radiological study
to evaluate the preliminary results of using magnetically-controlled
growing rods (MAGEC System, Ellipse technology) to treat children
with early-onset scoliosis. Between January 2011 and January 2015, 19 children were treated
with magnetically-controlled growing rods (MCGRs) and underwent
distraction at three-monthly intervals. The mean age of our cohort
was 9.1 years (4 to 14) and the mean follow-up 22.4 months (5.1
to 35.2). Of the 19 children, eight underwent conversion from traditional growing
rods. Whole spine radiographs were carried out pre- and post-operatively:
image intensification was used during each lengthening in the outpatient
department. The measurements evaluated were Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis,
proximal junctional kyphosis and spinal growth from T1 to S1.Aims
Patients and Methods
The outcome of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc
herniation is debatable. Some studies show results that are comparable
with those of primary discectomy, whereas others report worse outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of revision
lumbar discectomy with that of primary discectomy in the same cohort
of patients who had both the primary and the recurrent herniation
at the same level and side. A retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data was undertaken
in 30 patients who had undergone both primary and revision surgery
for late recurrent lumbar disc herniation. The outcome measures
used were visual analogue scales for lower limb (VAL) and back (VAB)
pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). There was a significant improvement in the mean VAL and ODI scores
(both p <
0.001) after primary discectomy. Revision surgery also
resulted in improvements in the mean VAL (p <
0.001), VAB (p
= 0.030) and ODI scores (p <
0.001). The changes were similar
in the two groups (all p >
0.05). Revision discectomy can give results that are as good as those
seen after primary surgery. Cite this article:
We describe a modified technique of micro-decompression of the lumbar spine involving the use of an operating microscope, a malleable retractor and a high-speed burr, which allows decompression to be performed on both sides of the spine through a unilateral, hemi-laminectomy approach. The first 100 patients to be treated with this technique have been evaluated prospectively using a visual analogue score for sciatica and back pain, the MacNab criteria for patient satisfaction, and functional assessment with the Oswestry Disability Index. After a period of follow-up from 12 months to six years and four months, sciatica had improved in 90 patients and back pain in 84 patients. Their result was graded as good or excellent by 82 patients according to the MacNab criteria, and 75 patients had subjective improvement in their walking distance. Late instability developed in four patients. Lumbar micro-decompression has proved to be safe, with few complications. Postoperative instability requiring fusion was uncommon, and less than using traditional approaches in published series.