The piriformis muscle is an important landmark
in the surgical anatomy of the hip, particularly the posterior approach
for total hip replacement (THR). Standard orthopaedic teaching dictates
that the tendon must be cut in to allow adequate access to the superior
part of the acetabulum and the femoral medullary canal. However,
in our experience a routine THR can be performed through a posterior
approach without sacrificing this tendon. We dissected the proximal femora of 15 cadavers in order to clarify
the morphological anatomy of the piriformis tendon. We confirmed
that the tendon attaches on the crest of the greater trochanter,
in a position superior to the trochanteric fossa, away from the
entry point for broaching the intramedullary canal during THR. The
tendon attachment site encompassed the summit and medial aspect
of the greater trochanter as well as a variable attachment to the
fibrous capsule of the hip joint. In addition we dissected seven
cadavers resecting all posterior attachments except the piriformis
muscle and tendon in order to study their relations to the hip joint,
as the joint was flexed. At flexion of 90° the piriformis muscle
lay directly posterior to the hip joint. The piriform fossa is a term used by orthopaedic surgeons to
refer the trochanteric fossa and normally has no relation to the
attachment site of the piriformis tendon. In hip flexion the piriformis
lies directly behind the hip joint and might reasonably be considered
to contribute to the stability of the joint. We conclude that the anatomy of the piriformis muscle is often
inaccurately described in the current surgical literature and terms
are used and interchanged inappropriately. Cite this article:
We undertook a randomised controlled trial to
compare the piriformis-sparing approach with the standard posterior approach
used for total hip replacement (THR). We recruited 100 patients
awaiting THR and randomly allocated them to either the piriformis-sparing
approach or the standard posterior approach. Pre- and post-operative
care programmes and rehabilitation regimes were identical for both
groups. Observers were blinded to the allocation throughout; patients
were blinded until the two-week assessment. Follow-up was at six
weeks, three months, one year and two years. In all 11 patients
died or were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups for any of
the functional outcomes. However, for patients in the piriformis-sparing
group there was a trend towards a better six-minute walk test at
two weeks and greater patient satisfaction at six weeks. The acetabular
components were less anteverted (p = 0.005) and had a lower mean
inclination angle (p = 0.02) in the piriformis-sparing group. However,
in both groups the mean component positions were within Lewinnek’s
safe zone. Surgeons perceived the piriformis-sparing approach to
be significantly more difficult than the standard approach (p =
0.03), particularly in obese patients. In conclusion, performing THR through a shorter incision involving
sparing piriformis is more difficult and only provides short-term
benefits compared with the standard posterior approach.
The primary objective of this study was to develop a validated classification system for assessing iatrogenic bone trauma and soft-tissue injury during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The secondary objective was to compare macroscopic bone trauma and soft-tissues injury in conventional THA (CO THA) versus robotic arm-assisted THA (RO THA) using this classification system. This study included 30 CO THAs versus 30 RO THAs performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperative photographs of the osseous acetabulum and periacetabular soft-tissues were obtained prior to implantation of the acetabular component, which were used to develop the proposed classification system. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities of the proposed classification system were assessed.Aims
Methods
We wished to quantify the extent of soft-tissue damage sustained
during minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty through the direct
anterior (DA) and direct superior (DS) approaches. In eight cadavers, the DA approach was performed on one side,
and the DS approach on the other, a single brand of uncemented hip
prosthesis was implanted by two surgeons, considered expert in their
surgical approaches. Subsequent reflection of the gluteus maximus
allowed the extent of muscle and tendon damage to be measured and
the percentage damage to each anatomical structure to be calculated.Aims
Materials and Methods
The inferior gluteal artery is described in standard anatomy textbooks as contributing to the blood supply of the hip through an anastomosis with the medial femoral circumflex artery. The site(s) of the anastomosis has not been described previously. We undertook an injection study to define the anastomotic connections between these two arteries and to determine whether the inferior gluteal artery could supply the lateral epiphyseal arteries alone. From eight fresh-frozen cadaver pelvic specimens we were able to inject the vessels in 14 hips with latex moulding compound through either the medial femoral circumflex artery or the inferior gluteal artery. Injected vessels around the hip were then carefully exposed and documented photographically. In seven of the eight specimens a clear anastomosis was shown between the two arteries adjacent to the tendon of obturator externus. The terminal vessel arising from this anastomosis was noted to pass directly beneath the posterior capsule of the hip before ascending the superior aspect of the femoral neck and terminating in the lateral epiphyseal vessels. At no point was the terminal vessel found between the capsule and the conjoined tendon. The medial femoral circumflex artery receives a direct supply from the inferior gluteal artery immediately before passing beneath the capsule of the hip. Detailed knowledge of this anatomy may help to explain the development of avascular necrosis after hip trauma, as well as to allow additional safe surgical exposure of the femoral neck and head.
When the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy is performed through an anterior approach, the ischial and retroacetabular osteotomies and manual fracture of the incompletely osteotomised ischium are conducted with an incomplete view resulting in increased risk and morbidity. We have assessed the dual anteroposterior approach which appears to address this deficiency. We compared the results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy performed in 11 patients (13 osteotomies) through a single anterior approach with those in 12 patients (13 osteotomies) in whom the procedure was carried out through a dual anteroposterior approach. The estimated blood loss, the length of anaesthesia, duration of surgery and radiological parameters were measured. The mean operative time and length of anaesthesia were not significantly different in the two groups (p = 0.781 and p = 0.698, respectively). The radiological parameters improved to a similar extent in both groups after the operation but there was significantly less blood loss in the dual osteotomy group (p = 0.034). The dual anteroposterior approach provides a direct view of the retroacetabular and ischial parts of the osteotomy, within a reasonable operating time and with minimal blood loss and gives a satisfactory outcome.
