Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Aims. Informed patientconsent is a legal prerequisite endorsed by
multiple regulatory institutions including the Royal College of
Surgeons and the General Medical Council. It is also recommended
that the provision of written information is available and may take
the form of a Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) with multiple PILs
available from leading orthopaedic institutions. PILs may empower
the patient, improve compliance, and improve the patient experience.
The national reading age in the United Kingdom is less than 12 years
and therefore PILs should be written at a readability level not
exceeding 12 years old. We aim to assess the readability of PILs
currently provided by United Kingdom orthopaedic institutions. Patients and Methods. The readability of PILs on 58 common conditions provided by seven
leading orthopaedic associations in January 2017, including the
British Orthopaedic Association, British Hip Society, and the British
Association of Spinal Surgeons, was assessed. All text in each PIL
was analyzed using readability scores including the Flesch–Kincaid Grade
Level (FKGL) and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) test. Results. The mean FKGL was 10.4 (6.7 to 17.0), indicating a mean reading
age of 15 years. The mean SMOG score was 12.8 (9.7 to 17.9) indicating
a mean reading age of 17 years. Conclusion. Orthopaedic-related PILs do not comply with the recommended reading
age, with some requiring graduate-level reading ability. Patients
do not have access to appropriate orthopaedic-related PILs. Current
publicly available PILs require further review to promote patient
education and informed consent. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1253–9